The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
As you love memes so much....


You must log in or register to see images

Your fantasies are your own affair, but you're right you're not insulting me.

All you have is petulance and bullshit. It's hardly evidence of this superior intellect you keep claiming for yourself. You're looking hollow and pointless.

If you're an example, I'm glad I'm thick.
 
Your fantasies are your own affair, but you're right you're not insulting me.

All you have is petulance and bullshit. It's hardly evidence of this superior intellect you keep claiming for yourself. You're looking hollow and pointless.

If you're an example, I'm glad I'm thick.

All you have is wind and piss, mate. Nothing of any substance.

You don't look hollow and pointless, you are hollow and pointless.
 
My bad.
The confusion is because there were two different points being made in my response to you.
The first point was that some of those who saw the advert (about money spent on the EU woukd go to the NHS) were not clear that it was not definitely going to happen.
This was in response to you saying it was obvious. I disagree.
The second point was you comment about "socialist delusion" and my response was pointing out that many socialist organisations were campaigning and arguing for an out vote so therefore not all socialists were in voters.
On several occasions I have seen terms about "looney lefties" on this thread and the fact is, many considered looney lefties such as the SWP, The Socialist Party, The RMT union and various prominent left wingers voted out like you did.
Maybe I have misunderstood the meaning of your comment about socialists in that post.
I have copied the post below in order that to help this make sense.
I understand. It was all a bit confusing
The second part of my comment was a bit flippant
I take your points though
 
  • Like
Reactions: remembercolinlee
I do not. What is the difference?
Any free trade deal could replicate access to the single market.

... gonna help you here Pete - even though you can't see it because you have me on ignore (I blame Edwina for that) ... access to the single market is actually a misnomer for lots of markets, collectively termed 'the single market' ... so really plural (you still with me?) ... 'any free trade deal' actually is a single market deal and, as such, might be individually worse than a collective deal due to the likelihood of a bulk discount effect ... <ok> <laugh>
 
I do not. What is the difference?
Any free trade deal could replicate access to the single market.
It doesn't for good reason.
In a free trade deal you are trading your goods in another market. You have to prove point of origin to show you are not passing off another countries goods as your own.
The clue is in the name, once goods enter the single market they are tradeable across the whole market without further checks and cost.

It's why we can't stay in the single market and have free trade deals. Any deal we negotiate would effectively give that country full access to the single market through the UK.

It is also what will cause us problems if we leave without a trade deal as much of our output is manufacture of imported goods and raw materials
 
Status
Not open for further replies.