Surely its different if its your own house??....You must have the right to feel at ease in
Your own house,surely?
No. If you're running it as a commercial enterprise, I.e. a B&B, you must obey the law.
Surely its different if its your own house??....You must have the right to feel at ease in
Your own house,surely?
It's like you're answering completely different comments to the ones you're quoting.
You literally said the same words as me and yet you think you're disagreeing, for some reason. Weird.
It's like you're answering completely different comments to the ones you're quoting.
You literally said the same words as me and yet you think you're disagreeing, for some reason. Weird.

You can't grasp the issue at all, which is why you can't answer basic questions and keeping flying off on tangents.I'm not struggling at all. Watching you flounder is a piece of piss.![]()
You can't grasp the issue at all, which is why you can't answer basic questions and keeping flying off on tangents.
It's pretty typical for you, unfortunately, much like your call for peace, just before you start insulting everyone.
You've asserted it. I'm not attempting to read your mind or something.Is that really what I think? How fascinating.
And when did I say such a thing existed?What, like the Ku Klux Klan hotel chain?![]()
You've asserted it. I'm not attempting to read your mind or something.
And when did I say such a thing existed?
Yet another attempt to go off on a tangent and claim something that nobody's said. There's a shock.
It can't have been emphasis, as you quoted me saying the exact same thing.Did I say I disagreed? Or was it more about the emphasis given the earlier conversation?
It can't have been emphasis, as you quoted me saying the exact same thing.
The earlier conversation wasn't about sex (gender) either, so it definitely wasn't that.
When did I say that I wanted a conversation about hotel chains, existent or not?Right, so you want a discussion about non-existent hotel chains, to shift the topic from the young lass in the wrong job. Because you DID say about them, despite you now trying to deny it.
No, it's not about gender. It's about sexuality. The B&B couple explicitly stated that's why they blocked the gay couple.So single sex groups isn't about sex or gender. Righty ho. As long as it's clear where you're trying to head.![]()
When did I say that I wanted a conversation about hotel chains, existent or not?
The conversation wasn't about the woman being in the wrong or right job, either.
Nobody agreed with her stance, based upon her religious beliefs.
It was about the difference between what she was doing and what the Christian B&B couple did.
No, it's not about gender. It's about sexuality. The B&B couple explicitly stated that's why they blocked the gay couple.
I asked if you'd be ok with black people being refused service based upon the religion of the business owners.You mentioned black people being refused a hotel room on religious grounds, and gave the KKK as an example. Have you forgotten already, or are you hoping everyone else won't notice?
I asked if you'd be ok with black people being refused service based upon the religion of the business owners.
You asked for an example of a religion that discriminated against black people and I offered two.
I didn't suggest that either ran hotel chains in England. That's just another one of your deflections, unsurprisingly.
When did I say that?It was a response to you saying it was against the law to refuse people of the same sex.
Furious Tesco shopper is ordered to 'go and join another queue' by Muslim cashier who refused to sell him a bottle of wine because it was 'against her religion'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...e-shopper-against-religion.html#ixzz4U9H2zxCY
I asked if you'd be ok with black people being refused service based upon the religion of the business owners.
You asked for an example of a religion that discriminated against black people and I offered two.
I didn't suggest that either ran hotel chains in England. That's just another one of your deflections, unsurprisingly.