The EU debate - Part III

Why can you never address anyone's points? It's embarrassing.

You were wrong about the B&B couple, so you've tried to go off on a tangent and have then refused to address that, either.
Don't you ever get bored of being sucked in by internet drivel and being shown that it's false and why?
It must get quite tedious.

 

It's your assertion. You're saying that they refuse this business, not me.

You're clearly trying to say that they're discriminating on the grounds of sexuality or you don't have a point.
You used it as an example of a non-religious group doing it.
If you're not doing that, then you've got no reason to bring it up, as it doesn't support your point.

 

If ýou run a b n b surely you have the right to turn away anybody you don't feel comfortable with?

 

**** me, you burble on about imaginary religions, and then accuse others of going off on a tangent.

Based on your recent shuffle, I'm guessing you've seen the single sex policy on the ferries and camps.

All in all though, you even agree the lass was wrong to refuse, but STILL try to create some sort of defence. Well you did, until you saw you'd screwed up. Now you're just desperately wriggling.

 

You're not allowed by law to discriminate on the grounds of colour, sexuality, or religious beliefs.

 

You actually do, you just can't do it because of their sex, sexuality, religion, disablities and certain other things, depending on the circumstances.

 

The management have the right to refuse admission, but they have to be able to justify it.

 

I haven't shuffled at all and I haven't looked up any policies. I asked you to support your own claims and you didn't.
As usual though, you're attempting to deflect from the actual point, as you've been proven to be utterly wrong.
No number of smilies covers that up, I'm afraid.

 

You can do it based on gender, depending on the circumstances.

 

The County Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court disagree with you if your grounds for turning them away are based on your disapproval of same sex relationships.

 

You mean, like I said, using those exact words, in the comment that you quoted?

 

So nowhere then, you gobby kiddie fiddler.

You're a complete sack of ****e

 

I keep bringing it back to the point, having humoured you with your ridiculous diversions that you can't support.

You agree with the basic point, so you reckon you're right when you make it, but I'm wrong when I do. Have a little laughing head.

 

Talking of sacks of ****e here's another complete whopper.

 

Dull slips back into work mode in the last sentence.

 

Surely its different if its your own house??....You must have the right to feel at ease in
Your own house,surely?

 

They'll be similar to the ones where you said I was wrong..until you checked. You're flipflopping all over with this.

 

You really struggle with this reading stuff, don't you?

I don't agree with the basic point, but you seem to think it's a completely different one to the reality of it, unfortunately.

 

I'm not struggling at all. Watching you flounder is a piece of piss.

 

It's like you're answering completely different comments to the ones you're quoting.
You literally said the same words as me and yet you think you're disagreeing, for some reason. Weird.