The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
PleaseNotPoll said:
You don't seem to have understood it, then. Maybe you should take some of those English lessons that UKIP are so keen on?
Click to expand...

Does he ultimately fund those groups?

Do they appear in protests that turn to riots?

Should he not be aware and speak out if he sees it as a concern, or apply a social conscience. I only caught a bit of the news, I saw Trump condemning in no uncertain terms attacks by people claiming to be his supporters, but I perhaps missed Obama or Clinton doing that.
 
The Zlatan said:
No, you didn't. But you're making this out as if there is a ranking to who is more valuable... As proven by what you wrote directly under this very question.

Are they all unarmed and totally innocent?
Click to expand...

The vast majority have been shown to be exactly that! Hence the outcry and the subsequent creation of black lives matter.

Nobody, but you, and your clearly racist ilk, have asserted or intimated that there is any ranking.

All human lives matter. But when you see a quite clear pattern of black people being treated in a way that the American police wound never do to white people, then it becomes clear that something needs to be changed.
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
Does he ultimately fund those groups?

Do they appear in protests that turn to riots?

Should he not be aware and speak out if he sees it as a concern, or apply a social conscience. I only caught a bit of the news, I saw Trump condemning in no uncertain terms attacks by people claiming to be his supporters, but I perhaps missed Obama or Clinton doing that.
Click to expand...
Which groups are you talking about?
 
NowsufferinginSpain said:
The vast majority have been shown to be exactly that! Hence the outcry and the subsequent creation of black lives matter.

Nobody, but you, and your clearly racist ilk, have asserted or intimated that there is any ranking.

All human lives matter. But when you see a quite clear pattern of black people being treated in a way that the American police wound never do to white people, then it becomes clear that something needs to be changed.
Click to expand...
It has often been the case in most high profile incidents that the police were justified in their actions. This isn't made clear though until after the investigations have taken place and until after BLM have flipped a section of city upside down due to left wing media alarmism and hysteria.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Born again Humanitarian and petersaxton
The Zlatan said:
It has often been the case in most high profile incidents that the police were justified in their actions. This isn't made clear though until after the investigations have taken place and until after BLM have flipped a section of city upside down due to left wing media alarmism and hysteria.
Click to expand...

That's bullshit!..

Worse, it's blatant racially biased bullshit!...
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
So some on here reject the democratically elected red candidate, partly because an extremist group, the KKK, created by the democrats to help keep black people down, said they endorse him, yet he described that as repulsive.

They support the blue candidate, even though they're endorsed and funded by a wealthy close friend, with a self confessed God complex, who believes normal rules don't apply to them, and has a history of creating civil unrest and funding groups aimed at undemocratic civil unrest. To add to the CV, he's an unrepentant nazi collaborator who stripped jews of their possessions, and has several international arrest warrants out on him.

Thank **** they lost.
Click to expand...


Congratulations - with this post you win the coveted Absolute ****ing Cobblers Award for internet bullshit, 2016 <cracker>
 
  • Like
Reactions: NSIS
NowsufferinginSpain said:
No, it's not. And, I suspect you know it.

But, your sick, racist mind can't think any other way...
Click to expand...
Watch this video, it goes over most high profile cases. The two most high profile I can ever think of off the tope of my head are Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin, if you don't want to watch it all then those two bits are at 2:57 and 10:30.

You must log in or register to see media
 
petersaxton said:
All of it
The first two things werent proven and the third isnt even a criminal offence
Click to expand...
Wife beater? Read the police report.
White supremacist? Read Breitbart.
Worked for Goldman Sachs? Factual and relevant, due to Trump's anti-establishment rhetoric.
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
Have you criticised people for supporting trump because of the KKK?

If you have, yep, you're a hypocrite for selective use of guilt by asociation <ok>
Click to expand...
I don't believe I've ever criticised anyone for supporting Trump for that reason. And I've already said the reason I don't support him is not guilt by association but very slightly because I can't imagine sharing common ground with the KKK on ANY subject.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
Wife beater? Read the police report.
White supremacist? Read Breitbart.
Worked for Goldman Sachs? Factual and relevant, due to Trump's anti-establishment rhetoric.
Click to expand...
PleaseNotPoll said:
Wife beater? Read the police report.
White supremacist? Read Breitbart.
Worked for Goldman Sachs? Factual and relevant, due to Trump's anti-establishment rhetoric.
Click to expand...
have you got any links to the first two?
are you saying that anybody who's worked for a big business shouldn't be in government?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back