The EU debate - Part III

Does he ultimately fund those groups?

Do they appear in protests that turn to riots?

Should he not be aware and speak out if he sees it as a concern, or apply a social conscience. I only caught a bit of the news, I saw Trump condemning in no uncertain terms attacks by people claiming to be his supporters, but I perhaps missed Obama or Clinton doing that.

 

who?

 

The vast majority have been shown to be exactly that! Hence the outcry and the subsequent creation of black lives matter.

Nobody, but you, and your clearly racist ilk, have asserted or intimated that there is any ranking.

All human lives matter. But when you see a quite clear pattern of black people being treated in a way that the American police wound never do to white people, then it becomes clear that something needs to be changed.

 

Which groups are you talking about?

 

Bannon.

 

#14707

 

It has often been the case in most high profile incidents that the police were justified in their actions. This isn't made clear though until after the investigations have taken place and until after BLM have flipped a section of city upside down due to left wing media alarmism and hysteria.

 

That's bullshit!..

Worse, it's blatant racially biased bullshit!...

 

That link doesn't work.
Could you just say which things he's being accused of that you think he hasn't done or are unproven?

 

Excellent retort...

It's not bullshit, it's the truth.

 

Congratulations - with this post you win the coveted Absolute ****ing Cobblers Award for internet bullshit, 2016

 

No, it's not. And, I suspect you know it.

But, your sick, racist mind can't think any other way...

 

You said: "And now a white supremacist and wife-beater as chief strategist. He also worked for Goldman Sachs.
Drain the swamp!"

 

And what part of that statement do you have a problem with?

 

It's a masterclass in bigoted, pointless nonsense, isn't it.?

 

All of it
The first two things werent proven and the third isnt even a criminal offence

 

Watch this video, it goes over most high profile cases. The two most high profile I can ever think of off the tope of my head are Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin, if you don't want to watch it all then those two bits are at 2:57 and 10:30.

 

Wife beater? Read the police report.
White supremacist? Read Breitbart.
Worked for Goldman Sachs? Factual and relevant, due to Trump's anti-establishment rhetoric.

 

I don't believe I've ever criticised anyone for supporting Trump for that reason. And I've already said the reason I don't support him is not guilt by association but very slightly because I can't imagine sharing common ground with the KKK on ANY subject.

 

have you got any links to the first two?
are you saying that anybody who's worked for a big business shouldn't be in government?