So you admit you probably insulted me first then?.......
Now we've sorted that out you can **** OFF.
The EU debate - Part III
- Thread starter Jürgenmeiʃter
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
Now we've sorted that out you can **** OFF.
How the **** did you read that and come to that conclusion?
I said that I don't remember insulting you and you take that to mean that I insulted you first?
Do you have serious comprehension issues?
3 years ideally wetty and I'm quite happy with 5ft 10" thanks, you gullible, knuckle dragging, moron
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38324146
Warning: Brexit-related link
May & co are confident it will be fine though.
Warning: Brexit-related link
May & co are confident it will be fine though.
It just shows how full of **** May, Davis & co. are!
IMO, this could drag on forever and a day. Trying to get anything ratified by every EU country will be a living nightmare!
During the EU referendum, the BBC adopted special editorial guidelines which required strict even-handed treatment of the Leave and Remain cases.
News-watch has now completed a rigorous academic survey which shows conclusively that these guidelines were effectively ignored. There was heavy bias towards the Remain side in BBC Radio 1’s Newsbeat, a flagship news programme which reaches millions of the under 30s.
A summary of the findings is below and the full report is here. The key points include that audiences were 1.5 times more likely to hear Remain opinions and speakers, alleged ‘fact checking’ by the programme which favoured the Remain side, and feature reports that were heavily skewed towards Remain arguments, especially with regard to immigration.
A disturbing implication of the survey is that – as the BBC refused to put in place rigorous bias checks – there is a high likelihood that other elements of the output were similarly skewed.
News-watch analysis found during the referendum build-up and campaign numerous examples of bias covering the flagship news and EU-related programmes on Radio 4, BBC1 and BBC2.
http://news-watch.co.uk/category/bbc-bias/
News-watch has now completed a rigorous academic survey which shows conclusively that these guidelines were effectively ignored. There was heavy bias towards the Remain side in BBC Radio 1’s Newsbeat, a flagship news programme which reaches millions of the under 30s.
A summary of the findings is below and the full report is here. The key points include that audiences were 1.5 times more likely to hear Remain opinions and speakers, alleged ‘fact checking’ by the programme which favoured the Remain side, and feature reports that were heavily skewed towards Remain arguments, especially with regard to immigration.
A disturbing implication of the survey is that – as the BBC refused to put in place rigorous bias checks – there is a high likelihood that other elements of the output were similarly skewed.
News-watch analysis found during the referendum build-up and campaign numerous examples of bias covering the flagship news and EU-related programmes on Radio 4, BBC1 and BBC2.
http://news-watch.co.uk/category/bbc-bias/
Migration is NOT up for discussion: David Davis vows UK WON'T compromise on border control
David Davis, the Tory Cabinet minister spearheading the drive to quit the EU, told MPs the issue of border controls will not be on the negotiating table in talks about the UK's future relationship with the bloc.
Instead, the number of EU migrants allowed into the country every year will be set by the Government according to the "national interest", he promised.
His remarks were a shattering blow to campaigners for a so-called "soft" Brexit who claim the UK should continue to abide by EU open-borders rules in return for staying a member of the bloc's Single Market.
David Davis, the Tory Cabinet minister spearheading the drive to quit the EU, told MPs the issue of border controls will not be on the negotiating table in talks about the UK's future relationship with the bloc.
Instead, the number of EU migrants allowed into the country every year will be set by the Government according to the "national interest", he promised.
His remarks were a shattering blow to campaigners for a so-called "soft" Brexit who claim the UK should continue to abide by EU open-borders rules in return for staying a member of the bloc's Single Market.
If they drag their heels, the UK will just end up on WTO rules and the EU lose.
The capital letters suggest this is an extract from the Daily Kustard.
Don't be ashamed to post links Koward.
I bet you have a picture of Lady Diana on your kitchen wall
The capital letters suggest this is an extract from the Daily Kustard.
Don't be ashamed to post links Koward.
I bet you have a picture of Lady Diana on your kitchen wall
You call me a coward, you need to look in a mirror, they you will see a true coward. Stan who calls white people trash, why will you not say it to my face?
I remember you are a real coward, now do us all a favour and go find a job you lazy little ****.
Find a quote where I call white people trash. A direct quote like the quotes in my sig
That's the difference Kustard.
How many times have you asked to meet up for a fight?
Some on here defended his comments that took delight in migrants drowning.
He'll say anything if it gets him attention.
- Status