The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Tobes said:
Number of toilets <laugh>

You've been chucking round abuse since you appeared today, first at NSIS and then at me after I had the temerity to point out your hypocrisy. Your self awareness is on a par with Kustard love
Click to expand...

I have responded to you in the same way you tend to respond to other posters. If I have been chucking out abuse to Spain, then quite frankly it is nothing to do with you, that's between Spain and me. He's a big boy and can fight his own corner.
 
steveninaster1 said:
Yep and that is the likely terms if we get involved in supplying money imo
Click to expand...

It would make sense. Portugal, for instance, could borrow floating rate money at half way reasonable rate over Libor. The UK can certainly borrow fixed rate far cheaper than they can. Terms of the swap to be agreed.

It would work for a country like Portugal who want to say boost dollar reserves,
 
pieguts said:
You may have noticed, in between the insults, that Cameron is no longer the captain of the ship. As I have said, additional contributions can be dressed up as many things. Can you catergorically say that if we made additional contributions in the future (either as part of the EU if we had remained or as trade fees), that they would not work there way back to the central bank?
Click to expand...
As you have said INCORRECTLY, contributions can't be 'dressed up' as anything, as our contribution is a FIXED percentage of GDP.

Why would any PM undo what Carmeron had negotiated with regards to any future Eurozone bailouts? What possible scenario would see that ****ing happen?
 
pieguts said:
I have responded to you in the same way you tend to respond to other posters. If I have been chucking out abuse to Spain, then quite frankly it is nothing to do with you, that's between Spain and me. He's a big boy and can fight his own corner.
Click to expand...
In the same way Dull can fight his own corner.........bingo
 
NowsufferinginSpain said:
Where have I said that Italy's possible banking crisis won't have any effect?? . I'll save you time, I haven't!..

Yes, the economy has out performed early forecasts. Economics is not an exact science, and never has been. However, the effects that have already hit the economy - mostly the drop in currency, will have the effect I stated. It really is just a matter of time before both manufacturers and retailers cannot or will not absorb additional costs, and pass them on to the consumer. Result? Inflation!.

What the UK economy does or does not do, viz a viz other economies is irrelevant.

The simple facts are, as was made clear by chancellor Hammond, are that Brexit has damaged the economy significantly. It will continue to damage the economy for the foreseeable future.

You started with the insults, pal, not me.
Click to expand...

You made an incorrect claim, when challenged, did your normal it's the lag effect speech and then discussed other posters as not being able to understand economics. Again prove what I said today, isn't factually correct?
Tomorrow, well that's a different story, which will undoubtedly throw up other challenges, but unless you have a crystal ball or magic beans you cannot state any of it as fact. You and Tobes now trying to insult and ridicule me, won't change those facts.
 
pieguts said:
You made an incorrect claim, when challenged, did your normal it's the lag effect speech and then discussed other posters as not being able to understand economics. Again prove what I said today, isn't factually correct?
Tomorrow, well that's a different story, which will undoubtedly throw up other challenges, but unless you have a crystal ball or magic beans you cannot state any of it as fact. You and Tobes now trying to insult and ridicule me, won't change those facts.
Click to expand...
What has he claimed that's been proven to be incorrect exactly?
 
pieguts said:
You made an incorrect claim, when challenged, did your normal it's the lag effect speech and then discussed other posters as not being able to understand economics. Again prove what I said today, isn't factually correct?
Tomorrow, well that's a different story, which will undoubtedly throw up other challenges, but unless you have a crystal ball or magic beans you cannot state any of it as fact. You and Tobes now trying to insult and ridicule me, won't change those facts.
Click to expand...

What incorrect claim?

The lag effect is a genuine part of monetary policy and of trying to predict when certain changes will take effect in the economy. Instead of prattling on about something you clearly know **** all about, why don't you do as I suggested and read?

You quoted figures of what had already passed, what's to dispute?

You've hopefully read Hammond's statement? If you don't believe me, read what he has to say. Maybe then it will all sink in?...

You started with the insults, pal, not me!.

I will say this again, and hopefully it will become clear this time. Brexit has damaged the UK economy significantly, and it will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. How badly, time will tell. But what's clear is that the damage has been done.
 
pieguts said:
I wasnt and have never fought Hulls corner. It started when I pointed out to Spain that a comment he made was not correct.
You on the other hand, have stuck your pants over your trousers, done you cape crusader bit and steamed in on your white charger.
Click to expand...
Post [HASHTAG]#20287[/HASHTAG]

Feel free to eat **** <ok>
 
NowsufferinginSpain said:
What incorrect claim?

The lag effect is a genuine part of monetary policy and of trying to predict when certain changes will take effect in the economy. Instead of prattling on about something you clearly know **** all about, why don't you do as I suggested and read?

You quoted figures of what had already passed, what's to dispute?

You've hopefully read Hamkond's statement? If you don't believe me, read what he has to say. Maybe then it will all sink in?...

You started with the insults, pal, not me!.

I will say this again, and hopefully it will become clear this time. Brexit has damaged the UK economy significantly, and it will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. How badly, time will tell. But what's clear is that the damage has been done.
Click to expand...

The incorrect claim you made about economies not growing. I merely pointed out that the US has by 15% and the UK 8%. In the same post you told us all that "scared little englanders" caused Brexit. It's the typical response from a number of you which again is factually incorrect. I personally know a lot of people of voted for Brexit and can assure you that they are not simple, racist, bigoted, scared or little englanders. If this is going to represent your posting style, then don't be surprised if people bite from time to time.
 
It seems some of the turkeys regret their vote for Christmas

You must log in or register to see media
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back