The EU debate - Part III

Do you think the "love" adds anything?

 

Yep and that is the likely terms if we get involved in supplying money imo

 

I have responded to you in the same way you tend to respond to other posters. If I have been chucking out abuse to Spain, then quite frankly it is nothing to do with you, that's between Spain and me. He's a big boy and can fight his own corner.

 

It would make sense. Portugal, for instance, could borrow floating rate money at half way reasonable rate over Libor. The UK can certainly borrow fixed rate far cheaper than they can. Terms of the swap to be agreed.

It would work for a country like Portugal who want to say boost dollar reserves,

 

As you have said INCORRECTLY, contributions can't be 'dressed up' as anything, as our contribution is a FIXED percentage of GDP.

Why would any PM undo what Carmeron had negotiated with regards to any future Eurozone bailouts? What possible scenario would see that ****ing happen?

 

Do you think your post added anything?

 

In the same way Dull can fight his own corner.........bingo

 

Is that your transvestite name or do you call that to Stan?

 

Is Stan always in your mind Kustard? He's taken over your consciousness hasn't he?

 

You made an incorrect claim, when challenged, did your normal it's the lag effect speech and then discussed other posters as not being able to understand economics. Again prove what I said today, isn't factually correct?
Tomorrow, well that's a different story, which will undoubtedly throw up other challenges, but unless you have a crystal ball or magic beans you cannot state any of it as fact. You and Tobes now trying to insult and ridicule me, won't change those facts.

 

What has he claimed that's been proven to be incorrect exactly?

 

I wasnt and have never fought Hulls corner. It started when I pointed out to Spain that a comment he made was not correct.
You on the other hand, have stuck your pants over your trousers, done you cape crusader bit and steamed in on your white charger.

 

The no growth in economy claims.

 

What incorrect claim?

The lag effect is a genuine part of monetary policy and of trying to predict when certain changes will take effect in the economy. Instead of prattling on about something you clearly know **** all about, why don't you do as I suggested and read?

You quoted figures of what had already passed, what's to dispute?

You've hopefully read Hammond's statement? If you don't believe me, read what he has to say. Maybe then it will all sink in?...

You started with the insults, pal, not me!.

I will say this again, and hopefully it will become clear this time. Brexit has damaged the UK economy significantly, and it will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. How badly, time will tell. But what's clear is that the damage has been done.

 

Where have I said that?...

 

Very little, but I'm not trying to be "billy big bollox" by finishing off sentences with "love"

 

Post #20287

Feel free to eat ****

 

The incorrect claim you made about economies not growing. I merely pointed out that the US has by 15% and the UK 8%. In the same post you told us all that "scared little englanders" caused Brexit. It's the typical response from a number of you which again is factually incorrect. I personally know a lot of people of voted for Brexit and can assure you that they are not simple, racist, bigoted, scared or little englanders. If this is going to represent your posting style, then don't be surprised if people bite from time to time.

 

It seems some of the turkeys regret their vote for Christmas

 

You will have to help me out a little as unlike some I don't look back, I find it so much more rewarding to move forward positively.

Feel free to eat ****......is that really the best you can manage