I thought it might have some relevant to the quote. So it was just a random question?
The EU debate - Part II
- Thread starter PINKIE
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
I don't think Lightning Stan wants to deal with anyone who can demolish
his comments with near-zero effort and no offensive language.
He could of course try to deflect from that with some attempted "banter" .
Surely you can work it out if you think about it. If not then don't let it bother you.
Not all of them. Lammy and Smith don't. They haven't accepted the referendum vote.
Theresa May chairs cabinet Brexit brainstorm at Chequers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37219143
It's good to see that we have a leader who gets on with things.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37219143
It's good to see that we have a leader who gets on with things.
So... this may have been covered already but I'm not digging through the ****e to find it
So... the EU has imposed on Ireland the order to recoup £11bn in back taxes from corporate giant Apple WHILE the Irish government is arguing against this AND actually backing Apple to pay less.
While there may be many criticisms the brexiteers (and the rest of us) have against the impotency of the EU machinery, you have to at least acknowledge this incident highlights how incompetent (or dare I say corrupt) individual governments can be when it comes to pandering to corporate giants. A disassociated EU has power to look at this and take a fair decision. Imagine if Ireland wasnt in the EU, Apple would've got away with it with the backing of the Irish government. And there's nothing to suggest the UK government is any different.
http://www.bakertillyinternational....ap-includes-ecs-anti-avoidance-proposals.aspx
1. So if the UK was not an EU member, it has benefited from adopting legislation
made elsewhere, without incurring the cost/speed/tedium of participating in its creation.
2. The UK is free to put in its own legislation that the EU either did not consider or
do not agree with.
Hmm ...
http://www.agreatread.co.uk/Product...781786483843&gclid=CPL51r-w684CFc2RGwodq-cFoQ
Description
Enid Blyton's books are beloved the world over and The Famous Five have been the perennial favourite of her fans. Now, in this new series of Enid Blyton for Grown-Ups, can George, Dick, Anne, Julian and Timmy survive the ultimate test of their friendship: Brexit? It is the night of the referendum and the Five have retired to Kirrin Island to enjoy the fresh air and sunshine, fed up with the rancour of public debate. George is firmly a 'remainer,' whilst Julian, who is in the 'Brexit' camp, is tolerated on the grounds that Anne cannot bear to go camping without him. (Timmy, largely apolitical but not keen on cats or rabbits, joins them too.) The night is tempestuous in more ways than one. George has managed to rig up a satellite link with the mainland so they can keep abreast of the news, and they sit huddled around the fire, amidst some tension, as George's initial hope that the 'remainers' will triumph proves premature...Meanwhile, a violent storm whips up. The damage is apparent as the new day dawns and George declares a new meaning for Brexit: Kirrin Island is exiting Britain...that is, until the red tape becomes too much of a challenge and their happy life together is under threat. Perfect for anyone sick of hearing that 'Brexit means Brexit', or for that relative you're still not talking to because of how they voted...
Description
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
Enid Blyton's books are beloved the world over and The Famous Five have been the perennial favourite of her fans. Now, in this new series of Enid Blyton for Grown-Ups, can George, Dick, Anne, Julian and Timmy survive the ultimate test of their friendship: Brexit? It is the night of the referendum and the Five have retired to Kirrin Island to enjoy the fresh air and sunshine, fed up with the rancour of public debate. George is firmly a 'remainer,' whilst Julian, who is in the 'Brexit' camp, is tolerated on the grounds that Anne cannot bear to go camping without him. (Timmy, largely apolitical but not keen on cats or rabbits, joins them too.) The night is tempestuous in more ways than one. George has managed to rig up a satellite link with the mainland so they can keep abreast of the news, and they sit huddled around the fire, amidst some tension, as George's initial hope that the 'remainers' will triumph proves premature...Meanwhile, a violent storm whips up. The damage is apparent as the new day dawns and George declares a new meaning for Brexit: Kirrin Island is exiting Britain...that is, until the red tape becomes too much of a challenge and their happy life together is under threat. Perfect for anyone sick of hearing that 'Brexit means Brexit', or for that relative you're still not talking to because of how they voted...
So it'd be more democratic to use the Royal Prerogative to steam roller it through, than it would to use the correct procedure of a Commons debate to repeal the 1972 act which saw us join the EU?
Democracy when it suits eh....
[HASHTAG]#standard[/HASHTAG]
I'll rephrase to save time. Do you think there are enough MPs who would vote against Brexit for it to matter whether parliament has a vote or not?
That is an irrelevance. If the pound hasn't strengthened against them then the cost of goods bought from those countries will be the same or more expensive.
I doubt there are enough MPs who would vote against to overturn the result.
However the number who would vote against does matter, in that it would
again show the degree of disconnect between Parliament and the electorate.
I don't know. It depends how many MPs realise that the referendum was a vote of the people and then more relevant than a vote of MPs.
If the exchange rates are the same, then so are the import costs.
Exchange rates remaining constant does not equal exchange rates weakening.
Or reflect the proportion of electorate that voted for/against.
In which case how would it show a disconnect?
The MPs are probably more aware of the real consequences of Brexit than most voters, who were lied to and misled by by Leave and Remain spokespersons, as we all know now.
- Status