The EU debate - Part II

[NSIS]

See now, there's the rub, and more signs of your mental frailty. How can I be wrong, when I never particularly claimed to be right?


Sit back. Here comes Tobes with some weird cut and pasting.

Cut the bullshit!

You tried to 'prove' a statistic as a point. It was shown to be an unsupportable point or comparison. Instead,of accepting that, you resorted to your usual tactics.

Which you're continuing to do hours later!....

 

[DMD]

Cut the bullshit!

You tried to 'prove' a statistic as a point. It was shown to be an unsupportable point or comparison. Instead,of accepting that, you resorted to your usual tactics.

Which you're continuing to do hours later!....

A a a and STILL you don't get the point. Have a read of my first reply, the one where I say I haven't checked so the figures might not support it. Does that really sound like someone desperate to prove a point?

I'll tell you what, just to save you some face, 'prove' can also mean test, as in 'it's the exception, that 'proves' the rule.' If we say you meant that, then that bollocks you've just written could just match the thing I initally posted.

I can't say fairer than that now, can I?

 

[The RDBD]

I've been skim reading through this discussion but two things are obvious.

1. Your posting style couldn't be duller. There's no wit, no banter, no intellect, no originality. You just drone on like you're delivering a health and safety seminar.

Stan confessing he cannot handle the mundane and serious nature of politics.
Go away and "banter" someone, Stan.

 

[NSIS]

A a a and STILL you don't get the point. Have a read of my first reply, the one where I say I haven't checked so the figures might ot support it. Does that really sound like someone desperate to prove a point?

I'll tell you what, just to save you some face, 'prove' can also mean test, as I 'it's the exception, that 'proves' the rule.' If we say you meant that, then that bollocks you'very just written could just match the thing I initally posted.

I can't say fairer than that now, can I?

Your attempted comparison was what was unsupportable...

The figures are not the point.,...

 

[Tobes]

Gosh, I'm guessing that's some of that fabled scouse wit. I'm also guessing you're only half scouse.

You think you're great at the art of posting your opinion under the guise of fence siting observation. Floating 'discussion points' as you've not got the bollocks to nail your colours to the mast.

This it seems, appears to give you the impression that what you're doing isn't blatantly obvious, and allows you the ability to scuttle away from the 'point' when it gets torn to shreds.

Only, your pathetic 'style' doesn't wash and merely shows you up as being a total sad act.

You remind me of the kind of blimp who works in a customer services dept. How to write paragraphs without actually saying anything of actual substance.

 

[The RDBD]

To be fair he said the GBP would tank and it has done. I assume that people who don't care about a weak pound work for ... a company that

gets its raw materials domestically or from nations with weaker currencies ??

 

[DMD]

Your attempted comparison was what was unsupportable...

The figures are not the point.,...

A a a and, still, you're just demonstrating why people think you're mentally ill.


See, your problem is this desperate need to not lose face, or at least not be seen to lose face. You need to see these boards of just random collections of letters, rather than the names of people that matter.

It's giving you stress and ulcers. Maybe you could find a new board to practice on until you get better at it? I mean, have you noticed how often your involvement and desperate, si plistic need for things to be right or wrong **** up a decent dision?

 

[DMD]

You think you're great at the art of posting your opinion under the guise of fence siting observation. Floating 'discussion points' as you've not got the bollocks to nail your colours to the mast.

This it seems, appears to give you the impression that what you're doing isn't blatantly obvious, and allows you the ability to scuttle away from the 'point' when it gets torn to shreds.

Only, your pathetic 'style' doesn't wash and merely shows you up as being a total sad act.

You remind me of the kind of blimp who works in a customer services dept. How to write paragraphs without actually saying anything of actual substance.

I don't think I'm brilliant at anything, I leave that to simple, shallow souls like you and the other mentally ill one that can only operate in binary.

I'd rather try and learn things by exploring the possibilities.

Like t'other fella, the fact you'very 'ripped something to shreds' says more about your limitations than much else.

Fair play though, you'very ****ed up another discussion between you.

It's as though you get scared by them when they progress beyond adveserial.

 

[Tobes]

I don't think I'm brilliant at anything, I leave that to simple, shallow souls like you and the other mentally ill one that can only operate in binary.

I'd rather try and learn things by exploring the possibilities.

Like t'other fella, the fact you'very 'ripped something to shreds' says more about your limitations than much else.

Fair play though, you'very ****ed up another discussion between you.

It's as though you get scared by them when they progress beyond adveserial.

Ah the last chapter of the standard Dutch MO, the moral high ground scramble

"You're all trying to win and I wasn't bothered"

What a complete ****

 

[DMD]

Ah the last chapter of the standard Dutch MO, the moral high ground scramble

"You're all trying to win and I wasn't bothered"

What a complete ****

Oh, I was bothered ( see, something else you got wrong) but not about being right, I never claimed to be. It's you and the other sad sack that **** up thread after thread, and drag them down to these playground levels. Ooh, is that one of those opinions you reckon I never have? Looks like something else you got wrong...see, this binary thing's easy, but dull isn't it.

I'm more interested in other people's considered view.

 

[NSIS]

A a a and, still, you're just demonstrating why people think you're mentally ill.


See, your problem is this desperate need to not lose face, or at least not be seen to lose face. You need to see these boards of just random collections of letters, rather than the names of people that matter.

It's giving you stress and ulcers. Maybe you could find a new board to practice on until you get better at it? I mean, have you noticed how often your involvement and desperate, si plistic need for things to be right or wrong **** up a decent dision?

It's trying to talk logically to idiots, like you, that's more liable to give me ulcers.

You're a thick headed wannabe intellectual, who has no real thoughts or opinions, or original ideas of his own. You merely post statistics that you try to use to fish for support for your warped far right wing agenda. When those are shot down, you try to backtrack and disclaim that it was ever an opinion, merely a discussion point. The hilarious thing is you really think other people are as dumb as you are and are going to just suck up your crap.

As to my "mental problem" it exists purely in the minds of you and your boneheaded Yorkie Mates.

Maybe it's a Yorkshite thing?

 

[DMD]

It's trying to talk logically to idiots, like you, that's more liable to give me ulcers.

You're a thick headed wannabe intellectual, who has no real thoughts or opinions, or original ideas of his own. You merely post statistics that you try to use to fish for support for your warped far right wing agenda. When those are shot down, you try to backtrack and disclaim that it was ever an opinion, merely a discussion point. The hilarious thing is you really think other people are as dumb as you are and are going to just suck up your crap.

As to my "mental problem" it exists purely in the minds of you and your boneheaded Yorkie Mates.

Maybe it's a Yorkshite thing?

I didn't post any statistics you thick ****, that's the point.

 

[Spurlock]

I didn't post any statistics you thick ****, that's the point.

Abuse alert....Pete is going to start thinking you are unhappy and irrelevant.

Tut, tut.

 

[NSIS]

**** off you moron.

You posted percentages etc, so don't try that crap..and tried to make ridiculous comparisons using those percentages.

It's late here. I've wasted enough time in my 'try and improve a cretin campaign' for this evening.

 

[NSIS]

Abuse alert....Pete is going to start thinking you are unhappy and irrelevant.

Tut, tut.

Pete's right, for once!

 

[Spurlock]

 

[DMD]

**** off you moron.

You posted percentages etc, so don't try that crap..and tried to make ridiculous comparisons using those percentages.

It's late here. I've wasted enough time in my 'try and improve a cretin campaign' for this evening.

You divvy, I said several times that I'd checked nothing, so how can I post numbers or comparisons?

I thought it was a bit obvious that the one percentage I did post was totally made up. The clues were there, but you were too dim. I can't believe a numbers expert was ridiculous enough to see it any other way.

You really are one of the most ridiculous people I've come across on the forums. Congratulations.

 

[Stan]

Stan confessing he cannot handle the mundane and serious nature of politics.
Go away and "banter" someone, Stan.

Stan confessing that he finds a dullard very dull.

I'm not sure I've ever noticed you post before but thanks for following Stan.

 

[Stan]

gets its raw materials domestically or from nations with weaker currencies ??

Fan of Stan, you need to construct complete sentences if you want Stan to take you seriously.

 

[Treble]

So... this may have been covered already but I'm not digging through the ****e to find it

So... the EU has imposed on Ireland the order to recoup £11bn in back taxes from corporate giant Apple WHILE the Irish government is arguing against this AND actually backing Apple to pay less.

While there may be many criticisms the brexiteers (and the rest of us) have against the impotency of the EU machinery, you have to at least acknowledge this incident highlights how incompetent (or dare I say corrupt) individual governments can be when it comes to pandering to corporate giants. A disassociated EU has power to look at this and take a fair decision. Imagine if Ireland wasnt in the EU, Apple would've got away with it with the backing of the Irish government. And there's nothing to suggest the UK government is any different.