The EU debate - Part II

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
PleaseNotPoll said:
You're literally just repeating me, after admitting that you made the initial claim! <laugh>
Is this it, now? You can just admit that you're wrong, you know?
Click to expand...

You made the claim in post 3430 of this thread. "All that I've seen from leave voters has been nonsense. They've been duped by a group of ultra-rich arseholes".
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
And you made the claim that voters hadn't been influenced in 3422, which is eight posts earlier:
http://www.not606.com/threads/the-eu-debate-part-ii.332715/page-172#post-9654944

Your claim. You back it up.
Click to expand...

And as I said earlier I haven't been influenced by it. Nor has any of the other voters I know. So there's quite a few voters that were not influenced by it.

Now, unless you're continuing to simply dismiss my reasons as nonsense, your own claim doesn't stand up.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
Prove it.
Click to expand...

I'm a voter, I wasn't influenced.

Your shout, as I added to my other reply. <ok>

Edit, I recall in a similar debate on the other EU thread, other posters saying the same, that they were voters, and not influenced by it either.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
You haven't proven anything. You've made a claim. You've then made another claim. That's it.
Stop trying to shift the burden of proof and support your claim, please.
Click to expand...

I am my own proof. I've stated quite clearly I'm a voter and I wasn't influenced. I seem to recall others on the other thread made the self and same declaration, which is also proof beyond an opinion poll.

It seems all you have is a need to dismiss peoples decisions and reasons if they don't match your preconceptions, and an inability to support your own spurious claims.

With that example, thank heavens your sort lost.
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
I am my own proof. I've stated quite clearly I'm a voter and I wasn't influenced. I seem to recall others on the other thread made the self and same declaration, which is also proof beyond an opinion poll.

It seems all you have is a need to dismiss peoples decisions and reasons if they don't match your preconceptions, and an inability to support your own spurious claims.

With that example, thank heavens your sort lost.
Click to expand...
You think that some people making an unsubstantiated claim on an internet site is proof of something.
Not just proof, but better evidence than a poll done by a professional company.
This should worry you.

You've also consistently ignored what other people have said about people that they know, while relying on the same evidence for your own claims.
You accept anything that supports your own conclusions, yet deny the same evidence if it doesn't.

You made the spurious claim. You can't support it. Sorry.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
You think that some people making an unsubstantiated claim on an internet site is proof of something.
Not just proof, but better evidence than a poll done by a professional company.
This should worry you.

You've also consistently ignored what other people have said about people that they know, while relying on the same evidence for your own claims.
You accept anything that supports your own conclusions, yet deny the same evidence if it doesn't.

You made the spurious claim. You can't support it. Sorry.
Click to expand...

Nonsense. You made a claim that simply doesn't stand up.

There seems to be a trend with remainers to arrogantly assume they know better than others why we voted as we did.

I outlined my reasons, you've pompously dismissed them and tried to imply I voted on some other criteria. That's simply your imagination at play.

No doubt you'll continue to imply we're all naive and duped by the lies, whereas you superior remain voters didn't buy any of the lies from project fear.

During the programme covering the elections, some remain politicians started to realise, and said that it was a mistake by their campaign, to try to scare people into thinking they'd lose something they didn't have in the first place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HRH Custard VC
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
Nonsense. You made a claim that simply doesn't stand up.
Click to expand...
We've already established that you were the one that made the claim. You've failed to support it.
You've also failed to supply any lies from the remain campaign, despite being asked for specific ones.

It's quite funny that you've actually demolished your own claim with this comment and failed to realise it.
You weren't influenced by the Leave campaign? Why are you talking about Project Fear, then? That was a part of it.

I'm off to bed now. Try not to post too much crap in my absence, ok?
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
We've already established that you were the one that made the claim. You've failed to support it.
You've also failed to supply any lies from the remain campaign, despite being asked for specific ones.

It's quite funny that you've actually demolished your own claim with this comment and failed to realise it.
You weren't influenced by the Leave campaign? Why are you talking about Project Fear, then? That was a part of it.

I'm off to bed now. Try not to post too much crap in my absence, ok?
Click to expand...

You keep saying I established it, but me posting your quote seems to dispute that.

I posted the misinformation from the remain camp earlier, and mentioned it again in one or two other posts.

The only claim demolished is yours, and you keep on helping prove my claim that some remainers on here will just keep telling us leave voters why we really made the decision we did, despite any evidence to the contrary.

I mention project fear, because that was the name given to the information you remain voters seem to lay such heavy store by. I read it, as I read the other stuff. I treat it for what it was, but considered it in case it changed my views. It didn't. My considered reasons for voting were the same as I outlined earlier, and that you pompously keep trying to dismiss.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
You're literally just repeating me, after admitting that you made the initial claim! <laugh>
Is this it, now? You can just admit that you're wrong, you know?
Click to expand...
He can't admit he's wrong, he's the all knowing being.

Amazing that he's managed to achieve that status from his council desk in Hull
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll
Tobes said:
He can't admit he's wrong, he's the all know being.

Amazing that he's managed to achieve that status from his council desk in Hull
Click to expand...

Ironically, for such a racist bigot, he's so full of **** that he must surely have dark brown eyes and skin!...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back