... and rightly so ... so what's ya point, ya jobbie?
Don't know
I'm sat here havin some peanut M&Ms and contemplating putting on some Arsenal fan tv
What you up to Fosse lad? Had your pre sleep **** yet?
... and rightly so ... so what's ya point, ya jobbie?
Don't know
I'm sat here havin some peanut M&Ms and contemplating putting on some Arsenal fan tv
What you up to Fosse lad? Had your pre sleep **** yet?


We have embarked on a mini health kick after a very heavy Easter weekend in Wales ... gonna try and stay off the booze and give our livers a chance to come out of shock ... already saving a fortune
Just enjoyed watching MOTD ... if our finishing had been more clinical we might have provided you lads with something to keep you going for the whole of the close season ... 24 attempts on goal ffs ...![]()
You must log in or register to see media

I'm here, you fat ****ing tone deaf moron.@Commachio where are you, saggy tits?
https://www.not606.com/threads/the-tottenham-hotspur-spiral-watch.335992/page-302#post-11990051
The link is above, so everyone can read it for themselves.
I see, also, that G4E clearly accepted the bet in those terms.
Thank you, Pix, for reminding me of that wager!
I do hope G4E will honour the wager.
I knew HIAG would try and welch this, so I took a screen shot at the time.
He's bang to rights. No welching this one Kipper
You must log in or register to see images
GTFO!
That came after G4E has accepted the very clear terms of the wager that I set out. The evidence is there for all to see.
No way are you helping him wriggle out of this one, Pix.

You must log in or register to see images
G4E clearly accepted the terms of the wager, and he is bound by them. What he wrote afterwards was merely a purposeful misquoting of the terms (which I clearly did not pick up on).
It makes absolutely no difference, as the wager had already been made and accepted.
It is basic English contract law.
Sorry, but all you have done is to remind me that G4E is about to owe me a forfeit.
He's fcuked, mate.
G4E clearly accepted the terms of the wager, and he is bound by them. What he wrote afterwards was merely a purposeful misquoting of the terms (which I clearly did not pick up on).
It makes absolutely no difference, as the wager had already been made and accepted.
It is basic English contract law.
Sorry, but all you have done is to remind me that G4E is about to owe me a forfeit.
He's fcuked, mate.
