The Cricket Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Given the weather, it is odd that we didn't send Albert in at no.3. If we end up with a reduced chase, DLS will hurt us for these slow overs.
 
Probably the best thing for us is that the rest of the day is washed out, and we can just continue from this point with a full game tomorrow. If we end up squeezing in a 20 over Worcs run chase later, I'd expect them to win it easily.
 
Poor effort.

We'd have been bettered served playing a sixth bowler than selecting Brown as a specialist keeper. I don't get why he didn't come ahead of Currie and Neal.

PP was fine. But just a nothing innings after that, aside from Orr.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saints_Alive and woolstonian
188 from 27 overs.

So 18 overs lost, with a reduction of 63 runs. I would still heavily fancy Worcs, but maybe our chances are a little better now?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back