The Cricket Thread

[tomw24]

Try rotating the strike Albert rather than eating up dot balls. Pathetic.

 

[tomw24]

Albert shouldn't be in the team and certainly shouldn't be batting at 4. Not good enough.

 

[tomw24]

0 off 18. YAWN.

 

[tomw24]

HE SCORED A RUN

 

[tomw24]

Albert has to go.

 

[tomw24]

1 off 27 balls is pathetic.

 

[woolstonian]

Our batting is so fragile that we'll be lucky to gain any bonus points all season.

 

[tomw24]

I think Hampton needs to get the scoreboard moving while Prest stays in now.

 

[tomw24]

Could have been a lot worse than a 34 run deficit in the end.

 

[st_brendy]

42-ball century for Vincey

 

[st_brendy]

How big a lead do Yorkshire want exactly?! Especially given how long Worcs managed to bat out for a draw last week.

Oh, as I type, they declare.

 

[The Ides of March]

Crawley making some runs in Kent's second innings, not that the Middlesex attack is the most daunting in the cricket world these days.

 

[tomw24]

Seems Surrey have been banned from using their fast bowlers due to the light.

 

[tomw24]

Seems Surrey have been banned from using their fast bowlers due to the light.

Or just Roach.

 

[st_brendy]

Excellent run chase by Kent

 

[woolstonian]

Seems Surrey have been banned from using their fast bowlers due to the light.

Odd, Roach has just taken a wicket!

 

[st_brendy]

Fortunately I doubt it will have any impact on the result (because this score was always too big to chase), but that whole hour or so was farcical. I feel sorry for our batters.

But then again, I've never agreed with taking the light decision away from the batters.

 

[The Ides of March]

Excellent run chase by Kent

RAWMOK will be extremely happy. Not sure Crawley will be. This was a missed opportunity to make a big score against Middlesex's "world" class attack.

 

[tomw24]

Albert nicks behind but Roach luckily had overstepped.

 

[tomw24]

Happy with that first session. Given ourselves a chance of saving the game.