The Cricket Thread

My knowledge of Warwickshire bowlers is limited, not to say non-existent. Do they have the players to bowl out Surrey, or will Surrey batsmen (OK, batters) progress towards an inevitable victory?
Hannon-Dalby and Norwell are good bowlers for sure. And Brad will be extremely motivated to get wickets. However Surrey do have an excellent batting line up so I would expect them to chase it down. But it's not a foregone conclusion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lemons and Oranges
Yes, it might be a blessing in disguise in that, with the ball nipping about, we might even get a Warwickshire win rather than just a draw. However, I would still expect Surrey to go ahead and chase their target, thereby taking away another opportunity for us to close the gap on them.
 
Hannon-Dalby and Norwell are good bowlers for sure. And Brad will be extremely motivated to get wickets. However Surrey do have an excellent batting line up so I would expect them to chase it down. But it's not a foregone conclusion.

Tom, you raise an interesting point: If (OK, a big 'if') Brad Wheal bowls out of his skin and gets a fifer, or better, could Surrey call 'foul' on Hampshire, as we loaned Wheal to Warwickshire?
 
Tom, you raise an interesting point: If (OK, a big 'if') Brad Wheal bowls out of his skin and gets a fifer, or better, could Surrey call 'foul' on Hampshire, as we loaned Wheal to Warwickshire?
No, it's perfectly allowed. Warks had an injury crisis and needed to loan a bowler at the end of the day.

This is one of those 'spirit of the law' debates: Loaning players is allowed, but that won't stop Surrey from feeling unhappy with the decision. Not that I care, you understand.