The Cricket Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
As much as you admire Indian cricket, the fact they can't create a wicket which has a chance of playing for 3 days here for an important day night test match is pretty awful. A good pitch should be a delicate balance between ball and bat but this is ball all day long.
 
As much as you admire Indian cricket, the fact they can't create a wicket which has a chance of playing for 3 days here for an important day night test match is pretty awful. A good pitch should be a delicate balance between ball and bat but this is ball all day long.
I agree, but you still have to play each ball on its merits. Bairstow in particular played what he imagined the ball would do, not what it actually did. Losing 2 wickets in the first over is just crazy, and every incoming batsman just expects to be beaten.

As I say, though, I completely agree about the wicket. This is halfway through day 2 for crying out loud, and it’s playing like Taunton on day 4 or 5.
 
I agree, but you still have to play each ball on its merits. Bairstow in particular played what he imagined the ball would do, not what it actually did. Losing 2 wickets in the first over is just crazy, and every incoming batsman just expects to be beaten.

As I say, though, I completely agree about the wicket. This is halfway through day 2 for crying out loud, and it’s playing like Taunton on day 4 or 5.

It is just bad business. They have fans in and a television contract. I don't think many teams in the world would have lasted much longer - and you have to credit India for making a decent start.