The Cricket Thread
- Thread starter TheSecondStain
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
This clip caused a sporting injury. I was underneath my MGB fitting a new stainless steel exhaust when Botham's unfortunate inability to get his leg over caused me to jerk up onto a sharp edge cutting my forehead and eyebrow. Mrs Jab heard the laughter came outside to see lots of claret flowing. "It's the cricket" I said "****ing bonkers" was the reply.
You must log in or register to see media
Looks like we've got De Kock.
Unless we don't pick him of course.
If you have De Kock you really have to use De Kock. De Kock demands action. I have often thought that having De Kock is only important if you have somewhere to put De Kock. When I was young I remember not having a slot for De Kock and at that point De Kock was just disappointing.
There is nothing worse than seeing De Kock pumping away in the nets, balls flapping all over, with nobody there to catch De Kock.
So our strongest line up is probably:
Vince
Warner
Davies
Stoinis
Russell
Dawson
Whiteley (?)
Jordan
Archer
Briggs
Mills
Vince
Warner
Davies
Stoinis
Russell
Dawson
Whiteley (?)
Jordan
Archer
Briggs
Mills
Every franchise has a wild card pick after the T20 blast so I would hope we select a wicket keeper otherwise we're screwed if Davies gets hurt.
We signed Warner ahead of De Kock. FFS!
Warner
TBF, he was good in Dixon of Dock Green....
Bizarrely, five sides have gone with just one keeper. We're all taking a huge risk - not just with injury, but also form.
I'm sure one or two of us might pick up a wildcard keeper, but probably not all five.
It's a great signing. No idea why he was let go originally.
I would argue that we're stronger than last year now. Briggs and Stoinis for Shadab and Pope. But yeah, I'd have rather we went for De Kock.
I'm wondering if we had a gentleman's agreement with Warner that if he was available we would re-draft him.
Hopefully our wildcard can replace Whiteley. Still not too sure what he or Rawlins are doing in the squad.
Yeah, get a decent batsman in and we've got a very good lineup. Our bowling attack is superb.
So the eight best XIs look something like:
Hales, Malan, Short, Root, Cox, Mullaney, Gregory, Khan, Coulter-Nile, Wood, Carter (excellent top order, strong all-round options, weak pace attack)
Vince, Warner, Davies, Stoinis, Russell, Dawson, Whiteley, Jordan, Archer, Briggs, Mills (excellent all-round options, excellent pace attack, nice balance between pace and spin, lacking out-and-out batsmen)
Finch, Lyth, Lynn, Stokes, Willey, Kohler-Cadmore, Simpson, Rashid, Stone, C Parkinson, Mujeeb (excellent spin options, strong all-round options, strong top order, lacking in the pace attack, weak keeper)
Bairstow, Banton, Duckett, Pope, Pollard, Cobb, Higgins, Richardson, Plunkett, Ball, Ahmed (strong top order, varied bowling attack, a few too many "bits and pieces" cricketers, lacking in the pace attack)
Roy, Jacks, Ingram, Billings, Narine, Blake, Curran, Curran, Mahmood, Lamichane, Topley (strong spin options, varied bowling attack, lots of bases covered without coming across as "wow")
Buttler, Salt, Clarke, Pooran, Ackerman, Lammonby, Shadab, J Overton, Rabada, M Parkinson, Gurney (strong spin options, varied bowling attack, strong top order, lacking a top all-rounder)
Crawley, Denly, Morgan, Maxwell, Lawrence, Rossington, Bopara, Nabi, M Wood, Crane, Amir (deep batting, strong all-round options, strong middle order, varied attack, lacking an explosive opener)
Livingstone, Bell-Drummond, Williamson, Moeen, Abell, Cooke, Howell, Woakes, Zampa, Brown, Afridi (solid options right through from 1 to 11, but maybe just lacking in the "wow" factor - ultimately though, they are just, just, just my favourites to win)
Hales, Malan, Short, Root, Cox, Mullaney, Gregory, Khan, Coulter-Nile, Wood, Carter (excellent top order, strong all-round options, weak pace attack)
Vince, Warner, Davies, Stoinis, Russell, Dawson, Whiteley, Jordan, Archer, Briggs, Mills (excellent all-round options, excellent pace attack, nice balance between pace and spin, lacking out-and-out batsmen)
Finch, Lyth, Lynn, Stokes, Willey, Kohler-Cadmore, Simpson, Rashid, Stone, C Parkinson, Mujeeb (excellent spin options, strong all-round options, strong top order, lacking in the pace attack, weak keeper)
Bairstow, Banton, Duckett, Pope, Pollard, Cobb, Higgins, Richardson, Plunkett, Ball, Ahmed (strong top order, varied bowling attack, a few too many "bits and pieces" cricketers, lacking in the pace attack)
Roy, Jacks, Ingram, Billings, Narine, Blake, Curran, Curran, Mahmood, Lamichane, Topley (strong spin options, varied bowling attack, lots of bases covered without coming across as "wow")
Buttler, Salt, Clarke, Pooran, Ackerman, Lammonby, Shadab, J Overton, Rabada, M Parkinson, Gurney (strong spin options, varied bowling attack, strong top order, lacking a top all-rounder)
Crawley, Denly, Morgan, Maxwell, Lawrence, Rossington, Bopara, Nabi, M Wood, Crane, Amir (deep batting, strong all-round options, strong middle order, varied attack, lacking an explosive opener)
Livingstone, Bell-Drummond, Williamson, Moeen, Abell, Cooke, Howell, Woakes, Zampa, Brown, Afridi (solid options right through from 1 to 11, but maybe just lacking in the "wow" factor - ultimately though, they are just, just, just my favourites to win)