The Cricket Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I feel Pakistan are around 80 to 100 runs too short as I do not think England´s batting will be so inept again. Pity Wood was the one to drop out. Would have preferred Anderson or Broad to have been 12th Man, or are these two so undroppable??
 
I feel Pakistan are around 80 to 100 runs too short as I do not think England´s batting will be so inept again. Pity Wood was the one to drop out. Would have preferred Anderson or Broad to have been 12th Man, or are these two so undroppable??
Broad has been England's best bowler lately.
 
He certainly found some rhythm against New Zealand IIRC.

OK, thanks for the feedback!!

PS: Good luck for the rest of the matches in the one-day Royal London Cup!! Am I right in thinking that the first-placed teams advance to the semi and play the winner of the second v third matches?
 
I feel Pakistan are around 80 to 100 runs too short as I do not think England´s batting will be so inept again. Pity Wood was the one to drop out. Would have preferred Anderson or Broad to have been 12th Man, or are these two so undroppable??
Yes. Broad and Anderson are the two best bowlers in English history. To have them playing together is a privilege not to be spurned.
 
OK, thanks for the feedback!!

PS: Good luck for the rest of the matches in the one-day Royal London Cup!! Am I right in thinking that the first-placed teams advance to the semi and play the winner of the second v third matches?

Yes. With the second placed teams getting home advantage in the "QFs" and the first placed teams getting home advantage in the SFs.
 
De Lange and Hogan both missing for Glamorgan, which is useful. Marsh meanwhile has left for international duty (akin to Amla).

Almost a case of Glamorgan just being Ingram.
 
I wonder how people feel about Ed Smith as a selector? With the recall of Buttler to the test team, without having played any 4 day cricket, would seem on the surface a reckless call. But, it seems Buttler has justified his call-up with a 50. Hope he goes on to make a really big score now to do his long-term test career no harm at all. As for Ed Smith, it is good that there is someone who thinks outside the box.
 
How would you assess England´s batting performance. It would appear they all got a good start. All deserving of a place in the side for the next test? Does Vince warrant a recall, or is it better for him to make really big scores in the County Championship to cement a place on the next winter tour?
 
How would you assess England´s batting performance. It would appear they all got a good start. All deserving of a place in the side for the next test? Does Vince warrant a recall, or is it better for him to make really big scores in the County Championship to cement a place on the next winter tour?

I feel Vince has had enough chances for England and has taken it.
 
I feel Vince has had enough chances for England and has taken it.

If we think back, two of England´s greatest, Gooch and Gower, were sometimes jettisoned, went back to county cricket before becoming batsmen of the highest class. Perhaps, this spell playing 4 day county cricket, is just what is required for Vince. Having said this, is he in England´s one day squads?