IF thats true why are we bothering with Vilhena?Put it this way, Cleverley is a better player than Vilhena
IF thats true why are we bothering with Vilhena?Put it this way, Cleverley is a better player than Vilhena
IF thats true why are we bothering with Vilhena?
Vilhena actually is a good player. He just hasn't been played enough so can't get into good form. He is only 20 and needs to be more consistent is all.Because he would improve our squad, as Cleverley would have done. Vilhena really isnt that good at this moment in time but is only 20 and is seen to have good potential. But as FLT says football is all about opinions, all valid in their own right (mine are just more valid than everyone elses)
Could we afford his wages if Clyne goes?Aleix Vidal joining Barca for €10m, great signing for them. They want Cedric Soares as well. That basically means Alves is leaving.
Aleix Vidal joining Barca for €10m, great signing for them. They want Cedric Soares as well. That basically means Alves is leaving.
Makele was a DM and not expected to score many but Steve is our attacking midfielder playing in advance of our two DMs so would expect him to score up to 10 goals a season. Lets face it he could have easily scored a hayrick against Spuds at SMS but completely fluffed them all.
He adds a lot to the team in hoovering up the ball in midfield and distributing but there are many box to box midfielders who can also score
Rules one club out of getting Clyne if true tho. Even if the papers say United haved moved on, they can still change their mind again.I thought it was pretty well know Alves is off; rumoured to United.
Rules one club out of getting Clyne if true tho. Even if the papers say United haved moved on, they can still change there mind again.
If we are to continue to develop and push for a higher finish than 7th we need to bring in players that are better than we already have, making Davis, JWP, Tadic etc pushed onto the bench for top games and become squad players used in the event of injury, suspension, rotation etcBecause he would improve our squad, as Cleverley would have done. Vilhena really isnt that good at this moment in time but is only 20 and is seen to have good potential. But as FLT says football is all about opinions, all valid in their own right (mine are just more valid than everyone elses)
The top attacking midfielders are scoring 10+ (Hazard, Silva, Chadli, Erikson) but 7+ seems about the mid range like Sigurdsson, Miralles, Ki Sung-Yueng, CazolaI agree, (apart from 10 goals) but that doesn't mean we don't need Davis and doesn't reflect on cleverly.
How many goals do you expect our strikers to get?
FYI, I think our leading league goal scorer in the last three years has had 14. 15 and recently 11 league goals. Who "expects" 10 from their midfielder? Not many Frank Lampards around Dark Lord.
If we are to continue to develop and push for a higher finish than 7th we need to bring in players that are better than we already have, making Davis, JWP, Tadic etc pushed onto the bench for top games and become squad players used in the event of injury, suspension, rotation etc
The top attacking midfielders are scoring 10+ (Hazard, Silva, Chadli, Erikson) but 7+ seems about the mid range like Sigurdsson, Miralles, Ki Sung-Yueng, Cazola
Our two Davis and JWP have added one all season
I think Ron sees Tadic as a main player...he spoke of his carrying an injury through most of the season necessitating a recuperating break. Remember Tadic when he first arrived....get him back to that and we'll be laughing.
Vilhena actually is a good player. He just hasn't been played enough so can't get into good form. He is only 20 and needs to be more consistent is all.
You must log in or register to see media
I've not seen Okaka, but notice he hasn't scored or assisted many. Is he what we need or is he bit of an Altidore?