Why should Terry apologise? According to him he didn't use racist language in the context everyone is assuming, so if he is right, then what would he have to apologise for? Anton had done nothing wrong and was receiving unwarranted abuse up until the point where he refused to shake Cole's hand. There he showed his true colours.
On 'the balance of probabilities' I think John Terry is innocent, had been badly treated and that Anto Ferdinand ha done nobody any favours with his actions. I might join in with some of the suggested chants tomorrow......
Terry had done somethign wrong, even in your version of events. Why on earth does he need to say ' I never called you a black ****' when 'I never called you that' works much better? Why even repeat the phrase? Is he thick? And Anton did something wrong by not shaking Coles hands, he considers Cole lied to protect a man who racially abused him. I dont see what hes done wrong at all.
"No wonder racism isn't reported on the pitch often, looking at the abuse he and Evra have got for doing nothing wrong" Apart from provably lie under oath as to why he changed his mind about what he was called.
No different to Suarez who initially said he hadn't said anything. No wonder Kuyt wanted out the whole business. He knows.
Yes key word being 'using'. The FA are basically saying that he was wrong even to say 'I didn't call you a FBC'. Uttering the words in any context constitutes a ban, which I do actually agree with, he is stupid for repeating them back (if that excuse is true).
Utter drivel. Suarez volunteered the information straight away, on the day, that he'd said 'negro' even before it was known that there was no cctv evidence of the conversation - apart from evra telling Suarez that his sister was a whore. Read the bloody report; Evra, when asked why he told the referee and Giggs ten minutes after the 'incident' that he'd been called 'negro', then changed it later in the ref's room after the game to 'n++++r' when urged by Ferguson, said he couldn't bear to even repeat the word 'n++++r", so much did it distress him. One presumes the FA didn't see the YouTube rant against Chelsea's black players. Under oath. As for Kuyt, he is on record as saying that Evra said the referee was only booking him because he was black, that the referee cheated him out of the toss because he was black, and was furious that a conversation they'd had in Dutch about what was said in Spanish, that he said himself he'd misinterpreted (just like Evra) was used aginst Suarez. again, read the ****ing report, or just this:- http://www.theanfieldwrap.com/2012/01/without-prejudice-the-curious-case-of-the-racist-non-racist/ Or infact, just on that nonsense of Suarez changing what he said, just read the bloody report and you'd see that's ludicrous.
There is nothing wrong with repeating it in the context that Terry stated he used it in, it's the intent behind its use which is important. He could have said what you suggested, but he chose otherwise and I could imagine how one would say it in the way that Terry is stating. It's not as improbably as people are making it out to be. And in answer to your last question, yes, Terry probably is a bit thick. And yeah Anton did do something wrong, I'm glad you agreed with me. But what did Cole lie about? Did he deny that Terry used those words, or denied hearing what he said?
A dead baby would be funnier than the joke you posted. The point I made, which you failed to even quote let alone reply to, demonstrated the real reason you felt that you needed to make that comment.
Spot on Yurilly, HiIAG thinks hes got the monopoly on things with his 'humour' but hes a sad old twat and we should pity him.
