Tainted Titles

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Gambol said:
Dunno how they were implemented/managed. Apparently, it's what HMRC is saying. Using them is fine. They are there for the reason that companies use them for; to minimise the liability of highly paid employees.

Perfectly legal. What is happening is an argument between HMRC and Rangers about how they were implemented/managed. Same thing happened years ago between HMRC and IT contractors. It was called IR35.

Again, not cheating.
Click to expand...

You're implying that Rangers have not cheated in their use of EBTs. HMRC obviously take a different point of view. And if they're found to be correct then your titles are tainted and should be taken from you and given to us :smile:
 
When you got beat by Kanaus you went and spent 15/20 millions pounds you never had , instead on investing on Davis , lafferty Whittaker etc you should have been paying the tax man , cheating end of , get the tainted title off now
 
I've explained the position. Carry on thinking what you want. <ok>
 
SaTan's Evil Twin said:
You're implying that Rangers have not cheated in their use of EBTs. HMRC obviously take a different point of view. And if they're found to be correct then your titles are tainted and should be taken from you and given to us :smile:
Click to expand...

So your saying a disagreement between us and HMRC about using a perfectly legal structure (tax law) is cheating?

That is ****in desperate. <laugh>
 
harryhood67 said:
When you got beat by Kanaus you went and spent 15/20 millions pounds you never had , instead on investing on Davis , lafferty Whittaker etc you should have been paying the tax man , cheating end of , get the tainted title off now
Click to expand...

There was nothing to pay. The disgreement about using a perfectly legal tax structure had not been settled.
 
SaTan's Evil Twin said:
So HMRC took you to court for "using a perfectly legal structure"?
Click to expand...

I thought you could read. I said HMRC claim the EBT was improperly implemented/managed (whatever than means). Rangers say it was properly implemented/managed. Two parties can't agree, you go to court.

An estimated 5000 compainies in the UK (including football clubs) use and/or have used EBT's.
 
Poor tina is still touching herself and nobody is even giving her a glance

She can't get a look in when there's serious fitbaw chat on the go
 
Gambol said:
I thought you could read. I said HMRC claim the EBT was improperly implemented/managed (whatever than means). Rangers say it was properly implemented/managed. Two parties can't agree, you go to court.

An estimated 5000 compainies in the UK (including football clubs) use and/or have used EBT's.
Click to expand...

And you're obviously not understanding what I'm saying. If the court rules in HMRC's favour then Rangers will have been found guilty of misusing EBTs to pay players, ergo 'tainted titles'.
 
SaTan's Evil Twin said:
And you're obviously not understanding what I'm saying. If the court rules in HMRC's favour then Rangers will have been found guilty of misusing EBTs to pay players, ergo 'tainted titles'.
Click to expand...

No, you are deliberately trying to twist what is happening to suit your notion of cheating.

If HMRC wins it means Rangers implementation/management was found improper. But that's up to the tax lawyers to sort out.

Next you'll be suggesting that Rangers knowingly and willingly mis-managed or improperly implemented it. That their accountants and tax lawyers were in cahoots and deliberately set out to defraud the tax man.
 
Gambol said:
No, you are deliberately trying to twist what is happening to suit your notion of cheating.

If HMRC wins it means Rangers implementation/management was found improper. But that's up to the tax lawyers to sort out.

Next you'll be suggesting that Rangers knowingly and willingly mis-managed or improperly implemented it. That their accountants and tax lawyers were in cahoots and deliberately set out to defraud the tax man.
Click to expand...

Now we're getting at the truth.

Cheating bastards.
 
Gambol said:
No, you are deliberately trying to twist what is happening to suit your notion of cheating.

If HMRC wins it means Rangers implementation/management was found improper. But that's up to the tax lawyers to sort out.

Next you'll be suggesting that Rangers knowingly and willingly mis-managed or improperly implemented it. That their accountants and tax lawyers were in cahoots and deliberately set out to defraud the tax man.
Click to expand...

No, you're clearly far too honest a club to do anything like that.

You must log in or register to see images
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back