Quite frankly, when the post Dev was trashing claimed that everything in it was "fact" I think he was probably right to react in the way he did. It's a great mechanism - just say "fact" without prviding any evidence![]()
What were expecting me to provide exactly ?
You want me to explain the whole history of middle eastern politics, in detail, with substantiated references ?
When I link half a dozen poll results from the Crimea he ignores it. When I ask a series of questions, and provide an already lengthy analysis which decntructs the western narrative, he ignores it. And you think im going to try to write some kind of referenced history book, so he can ignore that too ?

With no disrespect to Dev, Ive provided FAR more research, analysis and information than he has. If you want to look into the points ive made further (i know Dev doesn't), then I'd be delighted

In the mean time, if he or you wants to discuss it further, we can start with the points that ive already made and which have as yet gone unanswered



