Hi
After being to the hull game yesterday I have waited until I have seen motd before commenting on cats tackle, although a reckless challenge I think a yellow card was punishment enough which was also the opinion of murthy on motd.
I have also the sunday supplement on sky, t.adams and c.kamara also deemed it was a yellow, all pundits said the tackle on Johnson was worse than cats as both feet were off the ground, so how do refs get it so wrong. To me it proves cats reputation is getting him a guilty verdict before refs think about the tackle.
Cats has my backing on this one.
After being to the hull game yesterday I have waited until I have seen motd before commenting on cats tackle, although a reckless challenge I think a yellow card was punishment enough which was also the opinion of murthy on motd.
I have also the sunday supplement on sky, t.adams and c.kamara also deemed it was a yellow, all pundits said the tackle on Johnson was worse than cats as both feet were off the ground, so how do refs get it so wrong. To me it proves cats reputation is getting him a guilty verdict before refs think about the tackle.
Cats has my backing on this one.