Transfer Rumours Summer transfers

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Is this a good thread?

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .
haslam said:
I was thinking the same from this headline, it makes no sense. We need central defenders, a RW and probably a keeper. Then a back up striker as Wilson is actually dead.

If we go out and spend a good chunk of money (over £50m) on a striker then it's a huge red flag. If we boguht two then we're pretty much advertising Isak is off.

ps. obviously it's bullshit, I almost left that without saying but remembered some people don't pick up on such things.
Click to expand...

some people?

you mean Munse and Poonarmy I think
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saf and haslam
Sucky said:
So you're saying you bought a player so **** you farmed him out and now the loan club don't want him either..

As I said<laugh>
Click to expand...

That's not what you said though, you said he was doing well elsewhere.

He isn't.

He's the toxic one, not the club.

Not one of the other players who has left has said a bad word, only that ****.
 
Dr Venkman said:
Delap and another fwd that plays right across the front 3. It makes sense.
Click to expand...

If we're talking about a RW who can play as a striker then yeah that's fine. An Mbuemo type would be perfect for us. The idea that we'd spend big money on and out-and-out striker is nuts though given the other positions which need prioritising.

It's different if it's a young prospect who the club see an opportunity with. We've seen already that our owners make their minds up on a player and like to pursue it so can see Guehi and Ekitike being chased again. They're both good options but that's £100m+ I suspect and that'll be most of our budget.

I'm hoping we're a touch more canny than that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: No27
haslam said:
If we're talking about a RW who can play as a striker then yeah that's fine. An Mbuemo type would be perfect for us. The idea that we'd spend big money on and out-and-out striker is nuts though given the other positions which need prioritising.

It's different if it's a young prospect who the club see an opportunity with. We've seen already that our owners make their minds up on a player and like to pursue it so can see Guehi and Ekitike being chased again. They're both good options but that's £100m+ I suspect and that'll be most of our budget.

I'm hoping we're a touch more canny than that.
Click to expand...

Striker RW CB GK and a full back is ideal, but I genuinely think the Saudis are going to go for it now.

250 sounds fanciful, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's 150 plus. It's what you get that's important though.

Just been reading they're going quality over quantity.
 
Chief said:
That's not what you said though, you said he was doing well elsewhere.

He isn't.

He's the toxic one, not the club.

Not one of the other players who has left has said a bad word, only that ****.
Click to expand...
You have every right to be wrong mate.

Either way Utd are the worst I've ever seen them and that's something to celebrate

Oh and well done for using the reply button
 
Spurlock said:
Best one?

01/02 init?

Kim kallstrom, Kennedy bakircioglu and Razak Pimpong legends

Denilson from Real Betis for 8 mill in first summer transfer window if your smart enough
Click to expand...

Cant remember the year but the last one I played tevez and ibramhimavic were unknowns.. There was a cb called Lewis Buxton or something who didn't quite reach the heights of the pre mentioned, but was class in the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Dr Venkman said:
I was that guy that burrowed himself in using girders and then came out at the end with devastating bunjee missions.
Click to expand...
Me and gang of about 15 used to play it, 3 teams of 5, all controlling an individual worm.

Classic stuff. so much fun with a gang of yous
 
  • Like
Reactions: No27
Sucky said:
Me and gang of about 15 used to play it, 3 teams of 5, all controlling an individual worm.

Classic stuff. so much fun with a gang of yous
Click to expand...

Ringworm, tapeworm, arseworm and twat were the name of my faction I believe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back