Palace sign Chamakh on a one year deal.
Strange deal to me. If you back your signing, you want to give them a long-term deal so you have resale value and stability. If you don't back them, a one year deal offers lower risk, but why are you signing them? I'm still not convinced by their transfer dealings this summer.*
*I'll now be forced to eat my words when we sign Elmander on a one year deal...
Strange deal to me. If you back your signing, you want to give them a long-term deal so you have resale value and stability. If you don't back them, a one year deal offers lower risk, but why are you signing them? I'm still not convinced by their transfer dealings this summer.*
*I'll now be forced to eat my words when we sign Elmander on a one year deal...


