That’s insane. He has nothing to do with what’s happening over there.Not worth the politics carry on he would bring with him
I'm not convinced about some of this loan strategy.The problem I have in this instance would be that if we are to bring a RB in to challenge Hume,it will likely be a 3 or 4 year deal.If we send Huggins out for the season,and he fulfils his obvious talent elsewhere,when we want to bring him back,we'll have a first team player surplus to requirements.
People don't like him because he actively posted a pro israel post on his instagram when it was going onThat’s insane. He has nothing to do with what’s happening over there.
We can’t just rule out a nation of players because of how their country is behaving.
I look at it this way. If we have injuries / suspensions we should cover within the main squad. So take outfield players in a 24 man squad. 21 players. You have a minimum of 5 not getting a minute on the pitch. You might argue 6 or 7 depending on how subs need to be used. In the event we have say 5 or 6 injuries you can bolster the training group from u21s to keep number and quality high. One or two on a bench of 9 for a match day is no bad thing either. I would sooner that, personally, just to make sure coaching sessions are elite.That's the thing for me, I'd have a bigger squad this season due to injuries
We can't be left short in the PL
That’s insane. He has nothing to do with what’s happening over there.
We can’t just rule out a nation of players because of how their country is behaving.
He wasn’t suspended by Spurs. He was suspended by Instagram, who later apologised and reinstated his account.People don't like him because he actively posted a pro israel post on his instagram when it was going on
I'm just going by some fans reactions under that tweet and in my group who are quite strongly viewed when it comes to the conflict. There is some saying they will never go again while he plays for the club if we sign himHe wasn’t suspended by Spurs. He was suspended by Instagram, who later apologised and reinstated his account.
Plenty of teams will be chasing him. It’s a non-issue.
That looks like a guy showing support for his own country after they were wrongly blamed for something. There’s a different thread for this, so best to not go into it.You must log in or register to see images
this is one of the posts that annoyed a lot of people (this isn't my opinion i'm not clued up on most of it)
I'm just going by some fans reactions under that tweet and in my group who are quite strongly viewed when it comes to the conflict. There is some saying they will never go again while he plays for the club if we sign him

I'm not convinced about some of this loan strategy.The problem I have in this instance would be that if we are to bring a RB in to challenge Hume,it will likely be a 3 or 4 year deal.If we send Huggins out for the season,and he fulfils his obvious talent elsewhere,when we want to bring him back,we'll have a first team player surplus to requirements.
They weren’t wrongly blamed for that hospital attack, mind. Off topic though.That looks like a guy showing support for his own country after they were wrongly blamed for something. There’s a different thread for this, so best to not go into it.
Anyway, it looks like he’s going back to Leeds.
I would go for a flexible forward with real quality. An off the striker who could fill as striker left right or 10.
plus CB
Plus right back cover
Normally I'd agree but 24 is too low with some of our players injury recordsI look at it this way. If we have injuries / suspensions we should cover within the main squad. So take outfield players in a 24 man squad. 21 players. You have a minimum of 5 not getting a minute on the pitch. You might argue 6 or 7 depending on how subs need to be used. In the event we have say 5 or 6 injuries you can bolster the training group from u21s to keep number and quality high. One or two on a bench of 9 for a match day is no bad thing either. I would sooner that, personally, just to make sure coaching sessions are elite.
The alternative is you have a handful with the u21s for training, which I think is a poor outcome. Or they train alone. If we end up having to pay off contracts I would do so personally, to get down to a number the coaches are happy with.
I've banged on about it on here loads of times.....a proper reserve league is what's needed.If Huggins had a year on loan and proved to be as good as we hope, next year you'd be sitting with 3 right backs potentially worth £15/20m meaning you can sell one to help the budget next year. Keeping Huggins this season might mean we're not strong enough in the position, but also means he's still not getting a full season of football under his belt (which I don't think he's ever had).
Yeah, I think a winger is crucial due to AFCON, and we need the depth really.
for me, it would be RW, CB, RB, ST(?)
Yep, 26-28 for me this season, mainly because of concerns with some of our injuriesI don't mind having a bigger squad than usual this year personally, given the new challenge plus AFCON. I think next year we know where we stand and can remove a bit of bloat looking for a more elite squad, but 28-30 is fine with me as long as the absolute Deadwood is gone.