Transfer Rumours Summer Transfer window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Southern A said:
I know the consensus was that championship signings don't provide the value - but what about Tom Fellows from West Brom? Would give us something different on the right as a rare right footed winger who whips crosses in from the right rather than cuts inside.
Click to expand...
I think it'll be interesting to see what profile we go for with wide forwards. I'd kinda like to see us go for three goal threats with pace. Inside forwards rather than wingers. I still wonder (maybe even hope) that we change the way we set up for next season. A more functional, orthodox central three with a front three who all score goals and run powerfully. Sit deeper, stay more compact and then break at searing pace.

That being said, Fellows was a standout player at the level last season. Assume he'd cost a lot - although WBA lose their parachute money this summer so may be looking for an opportunity to balance the books.
 
williebeams said:
did see a mag say that if they sell for 120m or whatever, its approx 60m profit on what they paid and by PSR rules allows them to spend 300m spread over 5 years

it might be the answer to their psr problems, as no matter what you think of them, their spending for the most part hasnt remotely been like city in the hughes days
Click to expand...

Not for want of doing so. And the Saudis front loaded very heavily early on.
 
williebeams said:
did see a mag say that if they sell for 120m or whatever, its approx 60m profit on what they paid and by PSR rules allows them to spend 300m spread over 5 years

it might be the answer to their psr problems, as no matter what you think of them, their spending for the most part hasnt remotely been like city in the hughes days
Click to expand...

are they relying on making 60m profit on a sale every year in the next 5 years?
 
williebeams said:
did see a mag say that if they sell for 120m or whatever, its approx 60m profit on what they paid and by PSR rules allows them to spend 300m spread over 5 years

it might be the answer to their psr problems, as no matter what you think of them, their spending for the most part hasnt remotely been like city in the hughes days
Click to expand...
It hasn’t been allowed to be, that’s why. Also helps when the majority of their signings have worked out like. Some quality recruitment been done there
 
LD19SAFC said:
It hasn’t been allowed to be, that’s why. Also helps when the majority of their signings have worked out like. Some quality recruitment been done there
Click to expand...
yes but allegiances aside this PSR nonsense is not about sustainable ownership, its targeted as a level playing field and protecting clubs from failure, but firstly newcastle arent ever going to be in financial peril and secondly we all know PSR is the proverbial drawbridge to protect the traditional top 4.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Monkey69
I mean the newcastle team mostly compromise of players they paid over our record transfer fee for

Livramento
Hall
Botman
Bruno
Joe Lindon
Gordon
Tonali
Isak
Willock - Only a sub
 
LD19SAFC said:
Class player. No surprise there’s interest

You must log in or register to see media
Click to expand...
Getting some good pick ups from the prem - provides legs to De bruyne as well

Similar style of play that mctominay has been playing for them tho dont you think
 
  • Like
Reactions: LD19SAFC
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back