Transfer Rumours Summer Transfer window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
You must log in or register to see media


Borussia Dortmund in pole position to sign Sunderland’s Jobe Bellingham

EFL Analysis understands, via information from our transfer expert Graeme Bailey, that German giants Borussia Dortmund believe they are in pole position to land Bellingham’s signature in the summer transfer window.

It is understood that even if Le Bris’ side secure promotion back to the Premier League this weekend at the behest of Sheffield United, 19-year-old midfielder Bellingham will depart Wearside.

While there is definitely interest from Premier League clubs, we’re told Dortmund are confident they can get the deal done.
Graeme Bailey could tell me I support Sunderland and I’d have to double check
 
He probably only signed the previous deal on a 'gentlemans agreement'. If we then renege on the deal what message do you think that would send to our currant players, as well as possible new signings. You would go back to players and agents not trusting the club. If they do have such an agreement then I fully expect the club to honour it, and I would fully back the club on it
Whether we have a gentlemans agreement is hypothetical mind but I would disagree with the club if they have these kind of agreements when it comes to fees. Allowing leaving to certain clubs in certain positions I have no problem with but I wouldnt agree with the club having a policy where they agree certain fees with players for future years.

I agree with you if we have done it that it should be honoured, but Id disagree with having it in the first place.

Extreme example but say Mayenda signs a new deal this summer and we have a 'gentlemans agreement' that if a CL club comes next summer for £25m, we will sell. He then proceeds to score 20 goals in the prem and we stay up. Would be ridiculous to sell for that low in that instance. (I appreciate thats as unlikely scenario as it gets but just trying to explain why I would prefer us to stay away from promising certain things).
 
Whether we have a gentlemans agreement is hypothetical mind but I would disagree with the club if they have these kind of agreements when it comes to fees. Allowing leaving to certain clubs in certain positions I have no problem with but I wouldnt agree with the club having a policy where they agree certain fees with players for future years.

I agree with you if we have done it that it should be honoured, but Id disagree with having it in the first place.

Extreme example but say Mayenda signs a new deal this summer and we have a 'gentlemans agreement' that if a CL club comes next summer for £25m, we will sell. He then proceeds to score 20 goals in the prem and we stay up. Would be ridiculous to sell for that low in that instance. (I appreciate thats as unlikely scenario as it gets but just trying to explain why I would prefer us to stay away from promising certain things).
In this hypothetical it doesnt become a problem - its not a contractual clause that can be triggered and there would be clubs willing to pay much more, if theyre good enough to warrant higher fees we can still push the fees up, a friendly agreement with the player can still be altered depending on the level of interest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J Flash
In this hypothetical it doesnt become a problem - its not a contractual clause that can be triggered and there would be clubs willing to pay much more, if theyre good enough to warrant higher fees we can still push the fees up, a friendly agreement with the player can still be altered depending on the level of interest.
Yeah, that's where I'm coming from. If the club insist on any fee related agreements, just have a release clause and keep everyone happy. They'll do right by Jobe for sure but got to do right by us too. I think they will.

Would rather he just stayed like haha.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimHeron92
Yeah, that's where I'm coming from. If the club insist on any fee related agreements, just have a release clause and keep everyone happy. They'll do right by Jobe for sure but got to do right by us too. I think they will.

Would rather he just stayed like haha.
Nah thats dangerous business like, i prefer how we do stuff now - just say we wont let you go for less than X amount but can try and push it as far as possible when discussing with other teams.
Decent fee for an english player could become pretty useful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J Flash
One thing I don't get with Jobe is people saying his parents don't want him in premier league. The lad is past the age of his parents doing more than advise him if he doesn't play in the premier league because anyone feels the times isn't right it's Jobe! His parents aren't making decisions for him anymore. Now he might put a load of emphasis on what they say but he has the final decision
 
Nah thats dangerous business like, i prefer how we do stuff now - just say we wont let you go for less than X amount but can try and push it as far as possible when discussing with other teams.
Decent fee for an english player could become pretty useful.
I agree fully with this
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimHeron92
One thing I don't get with Jobe is people saying his parents don't want him in premier league. The lad is past the age of his parents doing more than advise him if he doesn't play in the premier league because anyone feels the times isn't right it's Jobe! His parents aren't making decisions for him anymore. Now he might put a load of emphasis on what they say but he has the final decision
Pretty sure his dad is his agent
 
  • Like
Reactions: Robertson
Probably an unpopular opinion but even if we did go up and sold Jobe for £30m, that £30m would allow us to spend a fair bit more if we offset it with amortisation. He’s a good player but as of right now, ability wise, he’s nowhere near that of a £30m player imo. He’s not our talisman as such, nor have we built a team around him so he’d be very easily replaceable. Obviously he has the potential to be so much more but I’d put my mortgage on us being a better team next season if we sold him and signed a few shrewd additions.

He would also likely develop more next season playing in a team like Dortmund surrounded by a good mix of quality youth and experience who are already fairly decent and play a certain brand of football whereas there’s a good chance we’ll be scrapping every game and take some heavy losses. I think it would be a good move all round for player and club.

I’m very aware I sound like the pessimistic ****er from The Sunderland Story :emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
Probably an unpopular opinion but even if we did go up and sold Jobe for £30m, that £30m would allow us to spend a fair bit more if we offset it with amortisation. He’s a good player but as of right now, ability wise, he’s nowhere near that of a £30m player imo. He’s not our talisman as such, nor have we built a team around him so he’d be very easily replaceable. Obviously he has the potential to be so much more but I’d put my mortgage on us being a better team next season if we sold him and signed a few shrewd additions.

He would also likely develop more next season playing in a team like Dortmund surrounded by a good mix of quality youth and experience who are already fairly decent and play a certain brand of football whereas there’s a good chance we’ll be scrapping every game and take some heavy losses. I think it would be a good move all round for player and club.

I’m very aware I sound like the pessimistic ****er from The Sunderland Story :emoticon-0102-bigsm
Massively agree tbh. Jobe has improved so much but I still don’t think he’s that good. He’ll be getting signed on potential.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WorkyTicketFTM
Pretty sure his dad is his agent

Still should be an advisory role nothing not a decision making role. Jobe decides where, when and if he goes! Not saying he won't listen to the advice from his parents but he won't be letting them decide if he nownis the righ time for the Premier league for example.
 
He’ll have loads of interest on a free transfer

You must log in or register to see media
 
Probably an unpopular opinion but even if we did go up and sold Jobe for £30m, that £30m would allow us to spend a fair bit more if we offset it with amortisation. He’s a good player but as of right now, ability wise, he’s nowhere near that of a £30m player imo. He’s not our talisman as such, nor have we built a team around him so he’d be very easily replaceable. Obviously he has the potential to be so much more but I’d put my mortgage on us being a better team next season if we sold him and signed a few shrewd additions.

He would also likely develop more next season playing in a team like Dortmund surrounded by a good mix of quality youth and experience who are already fairly decent and play a certain brand of football whereas there’s a good chance we’ll be scrapping every game and take some heavy losses. I think it would be a good move all round for player and club.

I’m very aware I sound like the pessimistic ****er from The Sunderland Story :emoticon-0102-bigsm
For much of the season I’d argue that he’s been our most important player bar none. He’s dropped off a bit in the latter stages of our season but when we were genuinely challenging for autos he was consistently our best player every week.
 
For much of the season I’d argue that he’s been our most important player bar none. He’s dropped off a bit in the latter stages of our season but when we were genuinely challenging for autos he was consistently our best player every week.
Aye, that can’t be argued with. He’s certainly been a miss when unavailable
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frazier the Lion
Don’t mind jobe leaving at that price as long we get a hefty sell on clause
 
For much of the season I’d argue that he’s been our most important player bar none. He’s dropped off a bit in the latter stages of our season but when we were genuinely challenging for autos he was consistently our best player every week.

He was very good for 3/4 of the season like but I do think as Sunderland fans we always look at our players with a bit of bias as all fans do of their own players. Up until about Feb/March he was comfortably our best player. I was quite surprised by fans of others clubs reacting to him being named in the TOTS, there was a LOT of fans saying it’s undeserved and he’s been nowhere near as good as the media make out. I think he’s somewhere in the middle to be honest, he’s getting plaudits off the media because he’s a Bellingham but that name is also hindering the opinion of other fans who think he’s instantly overrated because of that. If he was as much of a standout as we think he is you’d think other fans would pick up on that considering how often we’ve been on TV this season. But we have the pleasure of watching him every week so we know how important he is.

He’s got a massive future ahead of him for sure and I’ve no doubt he’ll play at a very good level but for £30m in the position we’d be in if we went up I’d want someone who’s twice the player he is at the present moment. An elite club can afford to throw £30m away and forget about it while he takes his time there and we don’t have that luxury unfortunately. £30m would’ve got you both Milenkovic and Lacroix this season, with change, who are both very good established defenders.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.