He might be a top player. But he hasn't really done that much yet. Canny in the summer, especially in the air. But he's 24 in Feb. He's not a kid and this is a huge price Is say
Exactly, they’ve had since the window opened to get a striker or two in but they’re now onto 2nd page of transfer targets, decent player but not for that money
Others don't want to play there in some respects. Or they were low balling and missed out. They fly by the seat of their pants.
This is absolutely hilarious. We've got a bloke we've never heard of taking the famous number 9 shirt ... ... the most embarrassing club in the world
dont read into the numbers its all relative to prem revenues compared to foreign clubs in addition to the fact the german side know Newcastle have a windfall from Isak
Hardly stolen him. Picked up a 50p bag of crisps and walked out the shop....but left a pound coin on the counter.
They seem to be going for the height strategy to supplement their new look Stoke 2010, strategy on display against Liverpool the other night.
To be fair that's exactly what you just did ... ... who else but Newcastle wouldn't put this deal together?
I havent though have i Theres a discernible difference in saying '65m is a lot of money' and then recognising that it is simply in relation to prem revenues and the potential isak windfall. In addition to primarily commenting on his attributes first, rather than cost.
I'm sure people recognise those facts and aren't just looking at one isolated figure tbf ... ... I just don't believe any other club is putting this deal together.
Bayern could, but have Kane and their hubris believed they would ultimately get him next year if u believe the rumours. The fee is nominal and relative, its just because it's 'them' that people are zeroing in on it
