Summer Transfer Window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
can’t say I’ve read the 25 pages discussing all this, but would be silly to think psg only became interested recently. Most clubs scout players for a good year or two (plus would have been aware of him given plays in same league) before they look to make a move (Manchester United seem to be the exception here :bandit:)

maybe they planned to go for him in a year or two after few more seasons experience, but the fact you guys were interested pushed things along.

Liken it to us and Diaz. We were scouting him for a good few years and the plan was to sign him this summer as a replacement to mane, but spurs interest in Jan pushed things forward for us.

might explain why it’s only a loan for psg as well as it’s a year or two ahead of schedule so want to keep their options open on him.
Hmm, seems like you are collaborating with Chaos. Looks like mafia behaviour. I vote to lynch InBiscanWeTrust
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flash and Munson.
That's because they're not interested in the player enough to buy him. They're loaning him on a whim.


You've reached a conclusion without sufficient evidence. We don't know what suits the club and player, but we do know they found a deal they're both happy with.


Anyway you've now gone from saying no clubs were interested to saying the club that was interested wasn't that interested, so we're getting somewhere.
 
Hmm, seems like you are collaborating with Chaos. Looks like mafia behaviour. I vote to lynch InBiscanWeTrust

I would argue this… but with all the name changes going on over here I’ve no idea who chaos is anymore!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obi Wan
You've reached a conclusion without sufficient evidence. We don't know what suits the club and player, but we do know they found a deal they're both happy with.


Anyway you've now gone from saying no clubs were interested to saying the club that was interested wasn't that interested, so we're getting somewhere.

I've explained where my evidence has come from. You've shown none that said anyone was interested in Jan.
 
can’t say I’ve read the 25 pages discussing all this, but would be silly to think psg only became interested recently. Most clubs scout players for a good year or two (plus would have been aware of him given plays in same league) before they look to make a move (Manchester United seem to be the exception here :bandit:)

maybe they planned to go for him in a year or two after few more seasons experience, but the fact you guys were interested pushed things along.

Liken it to us and Diaz. We were scouting him for a good few years and the plan was to sign him this summer as a replacement to mane, but spurs interest in Jan pushed things forward for us.

might explain why it’s only a loan for psg as well as it’s a year or two ahead of schedule so want to keep their options open on him.


Hallelujah
can’t say I’ve read the 25 pages discussing all this, but would be silly to think psg only became interested recently. Most clubs scout players for a good year or two (plus would have been aware of him given plays in same league) before they look to make a move (Manchester United seem to be the exception here :bandit:)

maybe they planned to go for him in a year or two after few more seasons experience, but the fact you guys were interested pushed things along.

Liken it to us and Diaz. We were scouting him for a good few years and the plan was to sign him this summer as a replacement to mane, but spurs interest in Jan pushed things forward for us.

might explain why it’s only a loan for psg as well as it’s a year or two ahead of schedule so want to keep their options open on him.


Don't talk about how things actually work mate
 
I've explained where my evidence has come from. You've shown none that said anyone was interested in Jan.


There's been loads of reports since January

Jesus you think I just made up all along and by chance psg popped up last week.

I was reading reports and putting two and two together because newcastle is a very interesting project, so I knew it wasn't Plymouth sniffing around causing the delay and agent demands

Go googling... It doesn't matter what I show you or GG even if its your own posts.
 
There's been loads of reports since January

Jesus you think I just made up all along and by chance psg popped up last week.

I was reading reports and putting two and two together because newcastle is a very interesting project, so I knew it wasn't Plymouth sniffing around causing the delay and agent demands

Go googling... It doesn't matter what I show you or GG even if its your own posts.

I couldn't give a ****. You simply ignore every other point that's relevant in the whole sorry saga and take things down your own path, with the only point you have a shred of hope of being proven correct on.

My entire issue was never the kid turning us down ot if there was other interested parties, you may have had that argument with others. Transfers fail for a variety of reasons. Personal terms, medicals, add-ons. ambitions etc. It was the antics and the behaviour of his agent I had issues with. During his first ever transfer negotiation thinking he was some sort of new breed of Raiola.

My point which you challenged all along was that we should move on and tell him to **** off. You stating we should see it through to the bitter end.

Somewhere along the lines clinging to the fact that I said you had swallowed his agents bullshit you seem to think you have one over me, and you've been proved triumphant. Maybe you were with others that you had the interest argument with, with me it was if we should walk away originally.

Fine he's signed for PSG on loan.

His agents still a ****ing ****, and failed to deliver the pay rise his client would have had elsewhere.
 
Chukwuemeka from Villa now up for sale with us and Barca interested. Villa want £20m. Comes from Romano.
 
I couldn't give a ****. You simply ignore every other point that's relevant in the whole sorry saga and take things down your own path, with the only point you have a shred of hope of being proven correct on.

My entire issue was never the kid turning us down ot if there was other interested parties, you may have had that argument with others. Transfers fail for a variety of reasons. Personal terms, medicals, add-ons. ambitions etc. It was the antics and the behaviour of his agent I had issues with. During his first ever transfer negotiation thinking he was some sort of new breed of Raiola.

My point which you challenged all along was that we should move on and tell him to **** off. You stating we should see it through to the bitter end.

Somewhere along the lines clinging to the fact that I said you had swallowed his agents bullshit you seem to think you have one over me, and you've been proved triumphant. Maybe you were with others that you had the interest argument with, with me it was if we should walk away originally.

Fine he's signed for PSG on loan.

His agents still a ****ing ****, and failed to deliver the pay rise his client would have had elsewhere.


I never ignored any point actually and I never called you stupid or told you the agent didn't try to do his job. .... You're becoming far too aggressive in this debate. I've had a somewhat troublesome time explaining things.

I've tried to move on but unfortunately you keep posting things about Ekitike signing and along with your companion GG simply will not accept that you were wrong and move on, so you keep trying to find news to support an idea psg were only interested for 5 minutes.


Seriously let's just move on mate. It's obviously causing more anguish than fun now and it's just not important. :emoticon-0148-yes: