Summer Transfer Window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
It's a way to inject funds at short notice. So if a target becomes available then the funds can be released very quickly


I understand that and it's good news, but Roland used that as evidence to suggest the numbers in this summers budget were incorrect.

He was wrong then
 
<laugh>

Took you a while, yet still a piss poor retort!

The evidence points to a single share being sold for £40m to give us the wedge to buy players. The same thing can and most likely will happen again. It's ok to be wrong, I am most of the time, but either way you don't have to keep labouring the point.
@Rumsfield if it’s this quote then he is right. It was to get wedge in. It does not however have any link to the amount we spent.

A pure and simple cash injection.
 
Excellent thanks ill now finish Roland off completely with some screenshots he made claiming the PIF had walked away
Roland is similar to me. Or should I say I was similar. I was pessimistic. But I have now seen the light.

And I am also in a good place which means I trust them.

80m is what I believe they may spend and if they do then massive respect as they are on track with what they promised which was indeed 250m!
 
Roland is similar to me. Or should I say I was similar. I was pessimistic. But I have now seen the light.

And I am also in a good place which means I trust them.

80m is what I believe they may spend and if they do then massive respect as they are on track with what they promised which was indeed 250m!

I like Roland but he's left me no choice.
 
]
This is therefore incorrect and he is wrong.

It was a cash injection. Nothing more and nothing less.

WTF?!

Chaos repeatedly posts these things about the amount being injected into the club as if it’s fixed. I pointed out that they injected another £40m to get a player bought. It’s hardly a quantum leap to suggest they could “inject” far more than the amount stated and covered in the press.

They will say what they need to and do what they need to, I’m just done in with the constant screenshots of the same old articles which prove nothing. The only proof is the spend on 1st September.
 
]


WTF?!

Chaos repeatedly posts these things about the amount being injected into the club as if it’s fixed. I pointed out that they injected another £40m to get a player bought. It’s hardly a quantum leap to suggest they could “inject” far more than the amount stated and covered in the press.

They will say what they need to and do what they need to, I’m just done in with the constant screenshots of the same old articles which prove nothing. The only proof is the spend on 1st September.

I merely show people the best evidence available..
 
]


WTF?!

Chaos repeatedly posts these things about the amount being injected into the club as if it’s fixed. I pointed out that they injected another £40m to get a player bought. It’s hardly a quantum leap to suggest they could “inject” far more than the amount stated and covered in the press.

They will say what they need to and do what they need to, I’m just done in with the constant screenshots of the same old articles which prove nothing. The only proof is the spend on 1st September.
They can and they will inject more and by the same methods. But it won’t be to buy players over and above FFP limitations which they have acknowledged as being in the region of 250m including infrastructure.

Your not wrong in the sense of the method. But moving forward they have to be within FFP and that’s why it’s only going to be 250m in the short term max.

All signings will need cash injected because Ashley left us with nil nada nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Munson.