Transfer Rumours Summer Transfer Window 2023

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Chelsea have sold a **** tonne of players already this summer and have a massive revenue pool compared to us (despite not being in Europe this year). No issue at all with them affording him. £80m over 5 years... even with what they've already signed, no problem.
 
Chelsea have sold a **** tonne of players already this summer and have a massive revenue pool compared to us (despite not being in Europe this year). No issue at all with them affording him. £80m over 5 years... even with what they've already signed, no problem.

With no Europe and the ****tonne they spent in Jan? That must have some effect.
 
This is from April...

Conclusion
Chelsea’s loss was again enormous, though it was significantly impacted by large once-off charges. However, it would have been even higher without considerable player sales.

It is likely that player trading will continue to be a very important part of Chelsea’s business model for the foreseeable future, partly because their squad is now ridiculously bloated, but also because it is their best chance of complying with FFP regulations (especially if they fail to qualify for the Champions League).

It would therefore be no surprise if many players leave this summer, including the likes of Conor Gallagher, Ruben Loftus-Cheek, Trevor Chalaboah, Callum Hudson-Odoi, Hakim Ziyech, Levi Colwill, and potentially even Christian Pulisic and Mason Mount.

The above is exactly what they've done, and generated a load of money doing it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego