Transfer Rumours Summer '23 Transfer Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I dont get what you want people to say? We have a smaller fanbase than a lot of clubs especially considering the size of the city and the nearest big club being miles away. The club is trying to get people back with cheaper tickets and a better off the pitch matchday experience but lets face it the one thing that will bring the hoards back constantly is attractive football or success. Neither of which we have right now.

The last time we had success the Allams did about everything to divide the fanbase and it worked. My mates I used to go with now no longer go and I doubt I'm the only one. They stopped during the Allams and during that and covid found better things to do. Subsequently they're also priced out due to the cost of living crisis.

It will take time but there's no point comparing us to other clubs as there's a lot of factors that seperate us and them on different levels. It's really not that hard

Yes, but other clubs who have had worse owners and gone through rougher times than us did not have as many jumping ship and a lot jumped back on the minute someone decent took over. Can’t understand why more do not want to be associated with a chairman who is like a breath of fresh air.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim the Tiger
I was on holiday at the end of April and a couple(round about my age) were on the terrace opposite me(along with her elderly parents).I was out having a beer one day in one of my old Hull City training tops and we got talking,he had an East Yorkshire accent,came from Scarborough,Leeds Utd fan,didn't go..Says it all really.
Sounds like my brother in law. He's from Scarborough. He used to get free tickets to Bellend Road, through his job. He went say a dozen times. Last time about 15 years ago. Now thinks he's a massive Leeds fan. Don't get me wrong, he's a decent bloke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ric Glasgow
Yes, but other clubs who have had worse owners and gone through rougher times than us did not have as many jumping ship and a lot jumped back on the minute someone decent took over. Can’t understand why more do not want to be associated with a chairman who is like a breath of fresh air.

Because as others have said there isn't exactly this longstanding history of overall success. We've only really found it in the last 20 years since Peter Taylor. Teams like Derby that are now struggling in league 1 have had a comparatively successful past so there is some of the older generation bleeding in the new. My generation that has grown up with success since Peter Taylor is now getting there but its still a mixed bag.
 
Sounds like my brother in law. He's from Scarborough. He used to get free tickets to Belland Road, through his job. He went say a dozen times. Last time about 15 years ago. Now thinks he's a massive Leeds fan. Don't get me wrong, he's a decent bloke.
He was a decent bloke:emoticon-0148-yes:

On the morning they went away,I got up at 7a.m for a coffee and they'd left a stack of cold beers on my outside table...Needless to say I switched the kettle off.
 
He was a decent bloke:emoticon-0148-yes:

On the morning they went away,I got up at 7a.m for a coffee and they'd left a stack of cold beers on my outside table...Needless to say I switched the kettle off.
Didn't call him Kevin, by any chance. I often wonder what happened to those beers!
 
I think the big factor determining whether your club has a big, local support base is whether or not your club were ‘big’ or successful before the establishment of the Premier League and Sky getting its talons into English football.

Derby, Forest, Boro, Sunderland, both Sheffield clubs to name a few were all established clubs in the top flight and/or won major honours before 1992, so their loyal support base has continued through the generations to the present day.

We first got promoted to the top flight in 2008 after Sky commercialised English football on a global sale.

This also plays a part in the ‘proper club’ vs ‘tinpot club’ debate. If your club was successful, ‘big’ or in the top flight for a while pre-Sky like Leeds, Forest, Sunderland, Derby etc. regardless of where they are now, it’s a ‘proper club’. If your success only came post-Sky, it’s considered ‘tinpot’. Chelsea have two Champions Leagues and Arsenal have none, but people still consider Arsenal the ‘bigger’ club because Chelsea’s success is more recent than Arsenal’s.
 
Totally agree. He is young and had a decent lay off. He also was forced to play quite deep early on from memory.
Far better player than some are suggesting in my opinion.

Who suggested he wasn't a good player? I believe the comment was he wasn't good enough right now for what we needed, but could still be a good player in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NewcastleTiger
I think the big factor determining whether your club has a big, local support base is whether or not your club were ‘big’ or successful before the establishment of the Premier League and Sky getting its talons into English football.

Derby, Forest, Boro, Sunderland, both Sheffield clubs to name a few were all established clubs in the top flight and/or won major honours before 1992, so their loyal support base has continued through the generations to the present day.

We first got promoted to the top flight in 2008 after Sky commercialised English football on a global sale.

This also plays a part in the ‘proper club’ vs ‘tinpot club’ debate. If your club was successful, ‘big’ or in the top flight for a while pre-Sky like Leeds, Forest, Sunderland, Derby etc. regardless of where they are now, it’s a ‘proper club’. If your success only came post-Sky, it’s considered ‘tinpot’. Chelsea have two Champions Leagues and Arsenal have none, but people still consider Arsenal the ‘bigger’ club because Chelsea’s success is more recent than Arsenal’s.
I think you’ve hit the nail on the head with the generational thing, though don’t agree with your timeline.
I first got into watching football in the early 70’s. The teams who we are now describing in this thread as having the most loyal fan base in spite of current league position were pretty much fixtures in the top division in that era. All are medium sized cities.
In the 60’s and 70’s it was still the ‘working class’ game. If you couldn’t afford it, you still followed your local team and would not likely to be woo’ed by teams you see on TV. It was probably at its peak in terms of that traditional support. As you say that would pass down the generations and with the population far less transient, and little other distraction, that fan base would likely grow almost exponentially through the generations.
So with our low fan base in the early 70’s, we had a low starting point. Most felt that with our catchment area, if we were successful, the crowds would follow. It never happened and maybe linked to that 70’s starting point?
It’s only my theory, any thoughts?
 
Last edited: