Transfer Rumours Summer '23 Transfer Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
There’s not many options for goalkeeper within our budget who would realistically come to us. I’d have liked Johansson from Rotherham but he’d cost a bit.
 
Shark Sports said:
I really don't care. I'd like us to bring in an older keeper we have the chance of retaining.

Keeper is just one position I don't want short termism in.
Click to expand...
Well we don’t have any money so it doesn’t really matter what you want:emoticon-0102-bigsm Rushworth would’ve probably been the best keeper we could’ve gotten on loan.
 
Kalman said:
There’s not many options for goalkeeper within our budget who would realistically come to us. I’d have liked Johansson from Rotherham but he’d cost a bit.
Click to expand...

How do you know who is and isn't available or may become available once other transfers happen? Plus how do you know if they're in our budget or not? (What is our budget for a keeper Btw?) And finally have you spoken to them all to ask if they're willing to come?
 
  • Like
Reactions: HebridesTiger, Canninho, PLT and 2 others
I'd be potentially testing the water with Thomas Kaminski from Blackburn. They need the cash, he wants a move and we need a keeper!
 
  • Like
Reactions: nbetiger
petersaxton said:
of course money is important
we seem to be making some bad decisions
we seem to bring people in with no idea whether they are any good
and then balk at getting somebody who we know is good
Click to expand...

Can you not get your head around top 10 or so playing budget vs not top 10 turnover. Acun makes up the shortfall and folk feel short changed.

Only in Hull.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shropshire Tiger, springtiger and willyfog
Kalman said:
There’s not many options for goalkeeper within our budget who would realistically come to us. I’d have liked Johansson from Rotherham but he’d cost a bit.
Click to expand...

He’s also not that ‘handy’ with his feet but an incredible shot stopper. Don’t think we would have seen him as someone fitting the system.
 
SydneyTiger14 said:
They don't do that because ffp doesn't care if you have debt or equity, it's a p&l test.
Click to expand...

They're not actually converting debt into equity, they're getting round the rules by creating equity, then paying cash for that equity and that becomes club income and lowers the losses. They're basically giving the money away, as there's almost no chance of ever recovering it, they're just diluting the share values each time they do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HullCityInEurope, highpeak tiger and nbetiger
Howdentiger2 said:
How do you know who is and isn't available or may become available once other transfers happen? Plus how do you know if they're in our budget or not? (What is our budget for a keeper Btw?) And finally have you spoken to them all to ask if they're willing to come?
Click to expand...

You tell me then. You’re ‘ITK’. 2 weeks until the season starts and every keeper we’ve been linked with has ****ed off elsewhere. Why is that?
 
originallambrettaman said:
They're not actually converting debt into equity, they're getting round the rules by creating equity, then paying cash for that equity and that becomes club income and lowers the losses. They're basically giving the money away, as there's almost no chance of ever recovering it, they're just diluting the share values each time they do it.
Click to expand...

That still doesn't impact FFP. Owner injections don't provide FFP relief or Man City wouldn't have to invent fake sponsors.
 
Kalman said:
You tell me then. You’re ‘ITK’. 2 weeks until the season starts and every keeper we’ve been linked with has ****ed off elsewhere. Why is that?
Click to expand...

Do you seriously think every player we are linked to is actually credible and serious. Just because we are linked with someone and they don't end up here, doesn't mean we missed out or they chose somewhere else over us.

Anyway I'll ask again seen as you made a pretty bold claim.....How do you know who is and isn't available or may become available once other transfers happen? Plus how do you know if they're in our budget or not? (What is our budget for a keeper Btw?) And finally have you spoken to them all to ask if they're willing to come?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drew, PLT and Tiger15
Howdentiger2 said:
Do you seriously think every player we are linked to is actually credible and serious. Just because we are linked with someone and they don't end up here, doesn't mean we missed out or they chose somewhere else over us.

Anyway I'll ask again seen as you made a pretty bold claim.....How do you know who is and isn't available or may become available once other transfers happen? Plus how do you know if they're in our budget or not? (What is our budget for a keeper Btw?) And finally have you spoken to them all to ask if they're willing to come?
Click to expand...

Not Darlow, obviously. Last bit isn’t worth responding to. Just typical smarminess from you.
 
SydneyTiger14 said:
That still doesn't impact FFP. Owner injections don't provide FFP relief or Man City wouldn't have to invent fake sponsors.
Click to expand...
Exactly. There may be money coming into the club but if they try to spend it on anything that reduces our profits or increases our losses it will affect FFP. (subject to the exceptions)
 
Howdentiger2 said:
No smarminess at all, you made a bold claim, I'm just asking you to back it up. Or was it just one of your typical dramatic over reactions without any actual substance and facts behind it?
Click to expand...

Okay, Mr. ITK. Let us know if you’ve got any info. The whole ‘I know something but can’t say’ thing is boring, like Patty with his secret streams.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back