Nice bit of shoplifting mate![]()
Amin pickpockets the pickpockets
Nice bit of shoplifting mate![]()
That's probably right for the rest of the world but in Acun's world it's 50% to get the original cheap deal, isn't it?Safe to assume 10-15%, that seems almost default these days. Would hope not much more than that.
First one you can do, Galatasaray got extra money from Zaniolo since Villa did not pay for permanent fee.I would make sure that there is a clause whereby if Barca backs out then the loan fee which should already be significant is increased. I would also have an agreement in place with Philogene that if Barca doesn't take him permanently a contract extension/new contract is triggered with us.
If there is a feeling that the player wants Barca(pretty likely) and the club feel they should somehow accommodate this. I would make sure that there is a clause whereby if Barca backs out then the loan fee which should already be significant is increased. I would also have an agreement in place with Philogene that if Barca doesn't take him permanently a contract extension/new contract is triggered with us.

If there is a feeling that the player wants Barca(pretty likely) and the club feel they should somehow accommodate this. I would make sure that there is a clause whereby if Barca backs out then the loan fee which should already be significant is increased. I would also have an agreement in place with Philogene that if Barca doesn't take him permanently a contract extension/new contract is triggered with us.
Like a Philogene for example?A loan Fee now plus an obligation to buy for 20 to 23 mill is a decent deal just try get something extra like a good prospect on loan.
If we never let him go his price might plummet if he decided not to give it his all because his head is turned.
Struggling to square Delap £10mill (IF true) with us expecting around £20 mill for Philogene?
Like a Philogene for example?
If it is an obligation then FFP/PSR wise I don’t think it harms us too much. We would be slightly more limited had we sold him this year up front but for the 3 year period including this and next year we can essentially spend some of the headroom. Not to mention if Greaves goes anyway.
If anything it could work for us as it’s spreading the benefits further. Would still want a good fee upfront however.
We would be completely limited this year, as we would lose Jaden and we'd only be able to include the loan fee which by the sounds would be minimal as Barca are completely skint.
It doesn't make sense unless it's an overpriced fee.
If we sell Greaves though it’s kind of moot. We’d have that available to us and then next year there’s zero pressure to sell.
If you keep him away from a big club, I don't think he will perform as he was to be fair. These things usually ends up that way.It just doesn't make sense though. We're basically giving Philogene away this year and won't see anything for 12 months, why would we do that? What's the point? We might as well keep him and sell him in 12 months
If you keep him away from a big club, I don't think he will perform as he was to be fair. These things usually ends up that way.
Yeah, in that case, I agree.There's 3/4 PL clubs after him, so he won't be staying, which is why it makes zero sense to loan him when we can get £20m this summer.