Suarez

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

What would you like to happen now?

  • Defend Suarez publicly, keep him

  • Condemn Suarez publicly, keep him

  • Stay neutral, keep him

  • Defend Suarez publicly (for now), sell him in the Summer

  • Condemn Suarez, sell him in the Summer

  • Stay neutral, sell him in the Symmer


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The poll is interesting shows how split people are on the subject.

No it doesn't. Most Liverpool supporters want to keep him, most Clog-sparkers and Bitters want us to sell (quelle surprise).No different to the online comments and polls of the Mail, Mirror, Independent, etc. Talking of the Mail, they're getting fantastically hysterical now- apparently allowing suarez to contest anything longer than a three-game ban (and why not - it's his ****ing right?) is a massive PR own goal, I think, considering we stopped him appealing over the Evra ban length after assuring him we'd stand by him, it's not peverse at all. Futile though: that ludicrous old ham Jeff Powell (he who was suggesting that we bolt on a minutes silence for thatcher onto the Hillsborough rememberance) and the rest of the Mail will already scream for his deportation if he gets anything less than a six-month ban. The FA are like the Brown government in being led like spineless wimps by the Mail and the Sun; Samuel was doing his best to up the ante today too by basically saying the FA are too scared to give him an exemplary ban, practically challenging them to, infact. The weather vane FA will fall for it too - wait and see. i said ten games, I'm convinced now it'll be 15.
 
No it doesn't. Most Liverpool supporters want to keep him, most Clog-sparkers and Bitters want us to sell (quelle surprise).No different to the online comments and polls of the Mail, Mirror, Independent, etc. Talking of the Mail, they're getting fantastically hysterical now- apparently allowing suarez to contest anything longer than a three-game ban (and why not - it's his ****ing right?) is a massive PR own goal, I think, considering we stopped him appealing over the Evra ban length after assuring him we'd stand by him, it's not peverse at all. Futile though: that ludicrous old ham Jeff Powell (he who was suggesting that we bolt on a minutes silence for thatcher onto the Hillsborough rememberance) and the rest of the Mail will already scream for his deportation if he gets anything less than a six-month ban. The FA are like the Brown government in being led like spineless wimps by the Mail and the Sun; Samuel was doing his best to up the ante today too by basically saying the FA are too scared to give him an exemplary ban, practically challenging them to, infact. The weather vane FA will fall for it too - wait and see. i said ten games, I'm convinced now it'll be 15.

The Mail are leading some sort of campaign to kick Suarez out. Quite pathetic and embarrassing really. Chris Bascombe from the Telegraph has written a few well balanced articles on Suarez which makes a nice change.
 
I'm sure the French are collectively crying into their wine. I mean, they only run Europe with the Krauts while little old England has **** all say<ok> not bad for cheese eating surrender monkeys

as for Islamic loon element, you cry racism on one thread, without warrant and here you are having pops at religons. What a nice fella<ok>

This is a common problem in this country - we're allowed to insult people based on many factors and it's generally accepted. However, mention skin colour and it's the biggest crime ever. Hypocrites.
 
I'm sure the French are collectively crying into their wine. I mean, they only run Europe with the Krauts while little old England has **** all say<ok> not bad for cheese eating surrender monkeys

as for Islamic loon element, you cry racism on one thread, without warrant and here you are having pops at religons. What a nice fella<ok>

PC WARNING

FROGS ARE ****S <ok>
 
I'm sure the French are collectively crying into their wine. I mean, they only run Europe with the Krauts while little old England has **** all say<ok> not bad for cheese eating surrender monkeys

as for Islamic loon element, you cry racism on one thread, without warrant and here you are having pops at religons. What a nice fella<ok>

lol, the French might have a great influence over your homeland, but thankfully they have little impact on mine <ok>

Oh & have you ever heard of the term 'joke'?

Me mentioning that there's an Islamic loon element in the UK, whilst posted as part of a jest, is in an actual fact & is therefore not having a pop at a religion, it's stating a ****ing fact you plank. <doh>
 
lol, the French might have a great influence over your homeland, but thankfully they have little impact on mine <ok>

Oh & have you ever heard of the term 'joke'?

Me mentioning that there's an Islamic loon element in the UK, whilst posted as part of a jest, is in an actual fact & is therefore not having a pop at a religion, it's stating a ****ing fact you plank. <doh>

And the fact is that some of those Islamafascists are black, yet even though that is a fact, if

you did a cartoon deriding Muslim fanatic bombers the mail would say it's a fact and tough on any innocent muslims (the overwhelming majority) who may be offended. Yet if one of those bombers was black and the cartoon looked even remotely like an ape.....
 
By the way Bird/Tobes, remind us how many games Fellaini was banned for retrospectively after MULTIPLE assaults in the Stoke game? Wasn't the argument that they couldn't exceed the precedents set?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.