Oh, just look at this:
"When, shortly after the match, he went to see the referee with the manager, Mr Evra
complained that Mr Suarez had said "I don't talk to you because you ******s". Mr Evra
told us that he believed, from the moment he heard Mr Suarez use the word “negro”, that
this meant ******. The Commission asked Mr Evra why, then, did he not tell the referee
that he had been called ******, as opposed to black. Mr Evra's answer was that even when
he pronounced the word "******s", it was not a word he liked to use. He added that
maybe it was also because he was speaking in English, that "black" was the English word
in his mind, and he felt he had done enough to complain by telling the referee that he had
been called black."
They bend over backwards and sideways to believe every word, lie, inconsistency and contradiction this little fart emits. Yet practically every word uttered by Suarez is deemed a lie unless proved otherwise. And this is a QC leading this commision? This MUST be challenged - this hearing is as fair and balanced as Martin Luther Ferguson's assessment of Blackburn's penalty today!