But most of all I love the Mancs jumping on there moral high horse, saying things like " dirty cheating bastard" As opposed to Suarez who simply called the nasty French bloke mate.
Oh and he pinched his skin as well, what a disgrace. Can see the headline now. "bloke arrested after pinch incident".
F.A = ****ing embarrasing arseholes. People from abroad looking in thinking **** me these people really are as dumb as they appear when dancing nude in places like Ibiza. Suarez damaged English football, where as Giggs banging his Sister in law was O.K? Political correctness gone mad!
the 'joke' is theyve covered giving terry a lesser ban , the entry point was 2 game ban, doubled if racial so 4 but they upped it to 8 because of the amount of times it was said and would have left it at 4 if it was only once, hmmm it seems to me like screw the foreigner and look after ol johnny english
Which is a form of racism, they have there head so far up there own arse that they can't see it. the F.A are the only racists for a lack of cultural understanding Suarez, dirty, greasy, bastard. Ban him for eight games. We will not put up with Racism in any form. *but discrimination is fine* *cough*
lets prove we dont like discrimination/racism by going way over the top on a foreigner, if i wasn't laughing i'd be crying
Oh, FFS! Apparently. because Suarez used the word 'concilitory' in his evidence AFTER he'd read it in the experts' submission this is is a some sort of indicator of him making it up. Or, to give the accused the benefit of the doubt, as you would have to in a proper court, it could be that English was not his first language and he was struggling to find a word to describe how he veered frequently between trying to calm down a heated argument and responding to vile insults, as we all do in those circumstances? When I heard MoTD tonight I really thought there was some killer inconsistency/untruth in Suarez's evidence, But this is bollocks - it's all about whether he meant his pinch to be friendly or an act of aggression. This wouldn't last one second in a true court. It is INCREDIBLE that the commision completely ignore the Evra started the confrontation, was the first to mention race and contradicted himself over the word used and the number of times used, and focus solely upon the unproved motive that Suarez must have intended malice because they were arguing. Yet they overlook that Suarez shrugged his shoulders and called the previous foul as a footballing incident in his attempts to calm Evra down. And what about the fact that Evra, a fluent English speaker giving evidence on the basis that he is totally fireproof to any consequences of his allegations is seen as a more reliable witness than an understandably nervous Suarez, watching procedings in a language he barely speaks knowing that the consequences of the allegations will slur him whatever the outcome. An ignorant, bandwagon-jumping Luther Blisset asked why Suarez was not being charged in a criminal court - bring it on! But for both of them, please!
Exacly, we think Terry said a bad word too, but the euro's are soon so maybe a 10,000 fine will be sufficient.
I object to your name you racist. You should be banned from this site for 8 days. I know nothing of this person, not his colour,creed etc. but based on my findings which are **** all he should be banned sign me up disciplinary commission
Anyway, we all know the truth, United a dirty, low down,cheating bunch of *****. Liverpool will walk away from this with there head held high. The only racists are Fergie & Evra.
Oh, just look at this: "When, shortly after the match, he went to see the referee with the manager, Mr Evra complained that Mr Suarez had said "I don't talk to you because you ******s". Mr Evra told us that he believed, from the moment he heard Mr Suarez use the word “negro”, that this meant ******. The Commission asked Mr Evra why, then, did he not tell the referee that he had been called ******, as opposed to black. Mr Evra's answer was that even when he pronounced the word "******s", it was not a word he liked to use. He added that maybe it was also because he was speaking in English, that "black" was the English word in his mind, and he felt he had done enough to complain by telling the referee that he had been called black." They bend over backwards and sideways to believe every word, lie, inconsistency and contradiction this little fart emits. Yet practically every word uttered by Suarez is deemed a lie unless proved otherwise. And this is a QC leading this commision? This MUST be challenged - this hearing is as fair and balanced as Martin Luther Ferguson's assessment of Blackburn's penalty today!
Is it o.k for me to say your sister is a Uraguian slag? Is that not worse than you little black bloke?
http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/112113-when-is-the-Suarez-verdict-published I put it in here but ill put on this thread too ... We have Luis for city on tues, oldham and city away in the cup. i expect an appeal on day 14 which will mean we have him for stoke in the league. Now if only he could stop being racist and belting balls of those white posts we could be set up nicely for when we lose him(and we will lose him)
I object to your name you racist. You should be banned from this site for 8 days. I'm a quarter Chinese as well! ehaps I should be called Donga Negrito? Surprised Yakubu hasn't been accused by Evra of some sort of ism, trumped up by Ferguson d'accord, after his performance today.
"In our judgment, nothing turns on the fact that Mr Evra may have thought that the word "negro" as used by Mr Suarez in the match translated as "******". Ultimately, it is a matter for us as a Commission to decide whether the words used were abusive or insulting and whether they included a reference to ethnic origin, colour or race." Doesn't that contradict what they said at the begining of this piffle that it didn't matter what intent Suarez may or may not have had in mind, it was a question of what Evra PERCEIVED the intent to be?
