You're being as coherent as a well respected politician[/QUOTE]
please get lost and do one your just not worth the effort
please get lost and do one your just not worth the effort
Last edited:
idiot if they did Boris would have lost, instead of having the biggest majority in 80 years44.6% of voters voted Tory, that's not a true majority.
Most of the electorate cast their vote against them
The fact that so many jumped ship to join Salmond's new part tells you all is not right with the SNP. Why risk splitting the vote unless its to score points.Just worth mentioning that the SNP are being investigated by plod, if that actually happens up there anymore, for the disappearance of most of the £600,000 raised to fight indyref2.
WOS has pursued this, and now some papers are in on it. The money has gone from the party's accounts despite very public promises that it would be ring fenced for the said purpose.
The SNAZIS are out of control up there.
Hope the daft fcukers self destruct.The fact that so many jumped ship to join Salmond's new part tells you all is not right with the SNP. Why risk splitting the vote unless its to score points.
Basically the indyref lot are lead by a woman who mislead Parliament and a bloke who although he got off, has admitted inappropriate behaviour towards women, with rumours of more scandals about both of them still circulating in the background. And as they now hate each other, they will probably chuck as much mud at each other as they can to cripple each other.
Hope the daft fcukers self destruct.
Long live Great Britain
Personally the sooner the whingeing scotch gits fcuk off the better

Oh, now you want to look at the 'not proven' option for Scottish courts, eh Nicola?![]()
I think that in view of recent events, she might wish to abolish the NOT GUILTY option as well.
On a serious note, I've read a few pieces, over the years, supporting Scotlands 'Not Proven' option for a Jury.
It's all part of the 'better that a guilty man go free than an innocent one is found guilty' theory.
If there are only the two options, then mistakes are likely.
This gives the options for any juror who is not satisfied, either way, to say so by returning a 'not proven' vberdict.
And I'm not convinced that removing this option from Rape Cases, which in the bit I read, was one of her reasons, will actualy result in more convictions.
With the Defence Barrister reminding the Jury that they need to be certain, (or is it just sure?), and no 'not proven' option, not guilty may be all that is left.
Still, with an election due, it may well appeal to the female voters.