Match Day Thread Stoke City (away)

[Royston Hawtrey]

Godden's talent for poaching in the box is null and void if we don't create chances for him.

Yes, we've won a fair few matches, but I still don't see the plethora of pinged crosses and through balls.

I will put my foot through the custard jelly if I seek Campbell & Leaburn starting again when the team is announced at 6.30.

It’s been done to death - with very limited success.

Let’s try something different tonight.

 

[Dick Plumb1]

I think it will be Oloafe and Campbell

 

[Royston Hawtrey]

With hindsight, we seem to have signed 4 players this Summer that NJ does not rate.

Knibbs
Costello-Rankin
Olaofe
Apter

they all have another thing in common too - they are not ex Luton

 

[Squareball]

With hindsight, we seem to have signed 4 players this Summer that NJ does not rate.

Knibbs
Costello-Rankin
Olaofe
Apter

they all have another thing in common too - they are not ex Luton

He doesn’t trust players he’s unfamiliar with. A chink in his managerial armour.

 

[Dick Plumb1]

I believe in showing loyalty to your players. But it is getting ridiculous with some players like Docherty and Campbell.

 

[Dick Plumb1]

Charlton: Kaminski; Ramsay, Jones, Gillesphey; Bree, Coventry, Docherty (c), Campbell; Carey, Berry; Leaburn

Subs: Mannion, Gough, Bell, Anderson, Rankin-Costello, Knibbs, Apter, Fullah, Olaofe

It looks like Campbell at left back.
What could possibly go wrong?

 

[PuttersCAFC]

Charlton: Kaminski; Ramsay, Jones, Gillesphey; Bree, Coventry, Docherty (c), Campbell; Carey, Berry; Leaburn

Subs: Mannion, Gough, Bell, Anderson, Rankin-Costello, Knibbs, Apter, Fullah, Olaofe

It looks like Campbell at left back.
What could possibly go wrong?

I would say more likely a back 4, Bree, Ramsay, Jones and Gillesphey. NJ certainly went into that shape on Saturday.

 

[Royston Hawtrey]

Dreadful line up - really bad.

This could be a long night.

 

[Royston Hawtrey]

Fvckin Leaburn & Campbell start …again

 

[Dick Plumb1]

I would say more likely a back 4, Bree, Ramsay, Jones and Gillesphey. NJ certainly went into that shape on Saturday.

I am pretty sure it won’t be four at the back.

 

[Royston Hawtrey]

I am pretty sure it won’t be four at the back.

It could be four in the back of our net though.

 

[Royston Hawtrey]

NJ clearly doesn’t trust 99% unless they are ex Luton IMO. It’s becoming perverse now . We are not the sort of club who can afford to spaff £4m on players who don’t play.

 

[Ponders Revisited]

Surely Bree and Campbell as wing-backs, with three central defenders, meaning four in midfield and Leaburn up top on his own.

We will lose by two.

 

[Royston Hawtrey]

You must log in or register to see images

 

[Dick Plumb1]

Surely Bree and Campbell as wing-backs, with three central defenders, meaning four in midfield and Leaburn up top on his own.

We will lose by two.

That is definitely the formation. With that formation it is imperative that Carey and Berry support Leaburn.

 

[Typical part 2]

Apter received much praise for his performance against Watford, but I was unimpressed for the most part.

He is lightweight and prone to misplaced passes. I certainly wouldn't put him in the starting eleven. We must have better options.

He is a strange one.

Charlton: Kaminski; Ramsay, Jones, Gillesphey; Bree, Coventry, Docherty (c), Campbell; Carey, Berry; Leaburn

Subs: Mannion, Gough, Bell, Anderson, Rankin-Costello, Knibbs, Apter, Fullah, Olaofe

It looks like Campbell at left back.
What could possibly go wrong?

 

[Typical part 2]

1.0 down

 

[Typical part 2]

2. 0

 

[Typical part 2]

Embarrassing

 

[Typical part 2]

This could be awful