Caulker is good but overrated.
How can he be overrated when seemingly no-one rates him?
£18m for those two does seem a lot given that Cardiff were relegated.
Caulker is good but overrated.
If true, my opinion is this is not good news. Neither player adds more than just depth to the squad imho with both being about level but no better than the weakest starter in their position.
I'd value them around at £7m and £3m personally, and neither signing would 'excite' me even if we did manage to get them at £10m for the pair.
I'm really not a big fan of buying last year's relegated players. I do know that they may be better than the team's overall position, but to expect that taking 2/5ths of a defence that conceded 74 will improve a defence that conceded 46 in the previous season is flawed from my perspective. If it was an attacker who didn't show their full potential because been given service I'd maybe be more inclined to think they'd improve more for the move, but with defenders and keepers I'm a lot more wary.
Marshall must be a really **** keeper to let in all those goals eh?!
Marshall made the most saves in the PL and was probably their best player this year.
Marshall made the most saves in the PL and was probably their best player this year.
To be honest, 18m isn't ridiculous money.. Marshall would command atleast 5m after a fantastic season and Caulker shone above most Cardiff players is young and has an England cap, 13m for that isn't over the odds by any means.
Marshall made the most saves in the PL and was probably their best player this year.
seems a high price but i don't know what out budget overall is.
instinctively i will be a tad disappointed it that's half or more of it gone.
I do actually like Caulker, more than most apparently, but that fee is terrifying.
Well I was told 40m before sales. Shaw deal looks likely so another 30m, so about 70m.
Didn't say we would spend it all but it would be there if needed.even though I'll take les at his word that all funds from sales will be available in the transfer budget, I'd be surprised if we spend it all in one window.
that way lies tottenham.
£35m was what i read elsewhere, i think.
assuming that this 18m comes out of the original budget (we're not replacing anything we've sold unless lovren is a done deal)Didn't say we would spend it all but it would be there if needed.![]()