I'm really quite chilled should Bruce stay and I do believe he will, although I also believe he should not. I do believe you can teach an old dog new tricks but ffs surely the simple failings I have seen and read about over the season and now, in the aftermath of relegation read yet again, are things that should have been glaringly obvious to him and his coaching staff - were these not old tricks for an old dog? I made this point this morning:
Then I read later today this good piece by Rick Skelton where he says:
Full post by OLM here
This is basic, fundamental football, nothing ultra-clever or sexy, but the bread and butter of the training ground - why did this excellent manager get that so very wrong?
I genuinely wonder on what level Steve Bruce has viewed his team and their performances; I have heard his sound-bite mutterings in interview, but I have never come close to hearing something that explains his actions as our head coach. Round pegs in square holes that baffled and frustrated us all - not to mention the players concerned. Prolonged side-lining of McShane when circumstances called for something better. Take the lead and forfeit it to baffling negative defensive substitutions. Using all of the subs on the hour leaving us open to injuries and a reduced manpower. Changing shape early because he called it wrong, again. I'll not mention Europe and the cups.
We need to stop blowing sunshine up his rear-end and ask him the questions we deserve answers to and not the ones he feels comfortable answering. If folk are going to extol his experience and qualities to smooth his path to another year as our manager then he, or they, should have no problem explain the shortfalls in his own individual performance. I do not believe it has been good enough and I really do want to understand what will change - don't you?
I think you have the essence of it, although I believe that, regardless of age, Bruce has proven he is limited in his thinking. I don't know what happens in training, but we have gone backwards in most aspects, not least set-pieces. For Steve Bruce to stay he must convince himself that he really does have a new approach with the day-to-day improvement of an underachieving squad. When the going got tough, we lacked tough players to get going, some were on the bench or the step though.
Then I read later today this good piece by Rick Skelton where he says:
2. Avoid training ground woes
I have no idea what we do in training. That isn’t ignorance or flippancy. It’s the result of watching the team make the same mistakes time after time while failing to address issues like poor set piece delivery and an inability to create and take chances. Bruce has had two assistant managers, Steve Agnew and Mike Phelan, and nothing has changed under either.
Can you name a player who has progressed since joining the club? Bruce has a knack for getting performances out of players who are under-achieving but his staff does not improve players. Players with promise like Jake Livermore, Tom Ince and Andy Robertson have regressed since we signed them.
Full post by OLM here
This is basic, fundamental football, nothing ultra-clever or sexy, but the bread and butter of the training ground - why did this excellent manager get that so very wrong?
I genuinely wonder on what level Steve Bruce has viewed his team and their performances; I have heard his sound-bite mutterings in interview, but I have never come close to hearing something that explains his actions as our head coach. Round pegs in square holes that baffled and frustrated us all - not to mention the players concerned. Prolonged side-lining of McShane when circumstances called for something better. Take the lead and forfeit it to baffling negative defensive substitutions. Using all of the subs on the hour leaving us open to injuries and a reduced manpower. Changing shape early because he called it wrong, again. I'll not mention Europe and the cups.
We need to stop blowing sunshine up his rear-end and ask him the questions we deserve answers to and not the ones he feels comfortable answering. If folk are going to extol his experience and qualities to smooth his path to another year as our manager then he, or they, should have no problem explain the shortfalls in his own individual performance. I do not believe it has been good enough and I really do want to understand what will change - don't you?