St Totteringham's Day

[PINKIE]

Meh... you've long since proven that you only moderate comments made by posters that you disagree with and properly read and comment on those you do agree with (and let them say whatever they want). I've seen God's Cock write insulting posts. I've seen loads of people slate A87. He might write tosh a lot of the time, and put the sensible things he has to say in angry writing but some of the stuff said back to him is just plain old insults and bullying. That you choose to selectively only remember a select few 'bitching' posts doesn't mean equally as many from others appear on here.

And where has anyone said that those who don't 'engage' are content with what we do? God's Cock wasn't simply 'not engaging'... he was actively saying that what we do is not mediocre. His opinion of course. And I post mine disagreeing with it. Which you don't like. Boo hoo.

I just fail to see how anyone can say that they have high expectations at the same time as thinking that what Arsenal achieve is not mediocre. I'm jealous in a way... I'd love to happy with simply seeing what we do as an achievement.

Meh... A87 and gods cock slag each other (and others) off in equal measure, so your bleating about being selective is wide of the mark. As for the rest I've already said that just because I don't bitch, it doesn't mean I'm happy with the situation.

 

[cini65]

Meh... A87 and gods cock slag each other (and others) off in equal measure, so your bleating about being selective is wide of the mark. As for the rest I've already said that just because I don't bitch, it doesn't mean I'm happy with the situation.

'Bleating'?... you're not arguing with HIAG here, you don't need to try and get a little dig in at every little moment to try and prove your not606 posting opponent is more wound up than you are. You've shown yourself to be selective... it's not an opinion... you categorically have been selective in the past. It's fact.

And I was commenting about God's cock, not you, so whether you're happy or not wasn't part of the debate.

 

[lazarus20000]

Hmm... Dont know about that. Lots of assumptions here.

How do you know the ages of posters here? How do you know they only started supporting arsenal when Wenger took over? When you say 'a lot' of people you know... How know arsenal supporters do you actually know? I reckon I know personally know about 6 other people who support arsenal. And to make a conclusive statement about supporting habits I'd need to have info from about 1000 times more people than that.

Ok so I'm not a walking surveying system. But it's safe to say that Wenger brought a hell of a lot of supporters to Arsenal during his tenure. The same can be said of other successful managers in Fergie and Maureen.

 

[cini65]

Ok so I'm not a walking surveying system. But it's safe to say that Wenger brought a hell of a lot of supporters to Arsenal during his tenure. The same can be said of other successful managers in Fergie and Maureen.

No doubt he has. I just don't think you can make a sweeping claim that it's the majority of those recent supporters only who want AW out.

 

[PINKIE]

'Bleating'?... you're not arguing with HIAG here, you don't need to try and get a little dig in at every little moment to try and prove your not606 posting opponent is more wound up than you are. You've shown yourself to be selective... it's not an opinion... you categorically have been selective in the past. It's fact.

And I was commenting about God's cock, not you, so whether you're happy or not wasn't part of the debate.

Great way of bleating on about not bleating.

 

[SpursDisciple]

Great way of bleating on about not bleating.

has anyone ever been less suited to being a moderator

 

[PINKIE]

has anyone ever been less suited to being a moderator

Thanks for the support

 

[BrunelGooner]

Some of our supporters don't really understand the concept of support.

This simply isn't true.

At the matches, support the side all you want over the 90 minutes. Before and after the game, and on forums like this, fans can say whatever the hell they want.

They're entitled to do so and you're not really in a position to tell people about how they should support the team.

However, with that being said, people were upset about the negative atmosphere at the Palace game. Whilst I understand that, it's hard to cheer the team on when they keep disappointing you every year and when there's an increasing number of disillusioned, disgruntled fans. Besides, sometimes you need the players to try and lift the crowd. If by support, you mean cheering the team on, then it isn't only a one-way street.

 

[PINKIE]

This simply isn't true.

At the matches, support the side all you want over the 90 minutes. Before and after the game, and on forums like this, fans can say whatever the hell they want.

They're entitled to do so and you're not really in a position to tell people about how they should support the team.

However, with that being said, people were upset about the negative atmosphere at the Palace game. Whilst I understand that, it's hard to cheer the team on when they keep disappointing you every year and when there's an increasing number of disillusioned, disgruntled fans. Besides, sometimes you need the players to try and lift the crowd. If by support, you mean cheering the team on, then it isn't only a one-way street.

I understand the frustrations, because I feel them too. I guess I come from an old school supporters standpoint where fans try to get behind the team to lift them, rather than sit back and wait to be entertained. I agree to a point it's a two way street, but it seems that the concept of the 12th man is completely lost on modern day Arsenal fans at times.