Match Day Thread Spuds v LFC
- Thread starter saintanton
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
no they actislly said they didn't intervene i.e. they were busy onClaiming it wasn't working but G.Neville is saying they could see it on commentary
a)smoke break
b) Pornhub
c) Playing Fortnite
All said and done, to still be 2 points off city having played newcastle, chelsea and spurs away already I think we can look positively to the future. I still think we are getting there as a team, a win against Brighton next weekend and you'd of taken the start we've had.
- May 22, 2011
- 73,755
- 25,682
- 113
Neville trying to suggests this where var didn’t even check was similar to uniteds offside against arsenal.
No Nev… that was offside and you’re annoyed cos the angle looked funny. This one they just ****ed up
No Nev… that was offside and you’re annoyed cos the angle looked funny. This one they just ****ed up
Corruption confirmed. They were showing it on Bein Sports an hour ago as being onside - we know what has happened, the PGMOL have DESPERATELY trying to doctor those images, but have realised that the original still is out there. Watch now as they conduct some sort of witch-hunt against the club in a Frech-police-in-Paris-like attempt to deflect from their utter venal, rigged, corrupt way they've conducted themselves this evening. Even Michelle Mone and Tory donors would be ashamed at this level of fraudulent dishonesty and chicanery. Bent to its very core.
Be very, very careful with what you now say, Jurgen. And please, take that ****ing worthless letter they're sending, wipe your arse on it, frame it and put it alongside the This Is Anfield sign. We go again - against the next opponents and the PGMOL. So ****ing be it.
Be very, very careful with what you now say, Jurgen. And please, take that ****ing worthless letter they're sending, wipe your arse on it, frame it and put it alongside the This Is Anfield sign. We go again - against the next opponents and the PGMOL. So ****ing be it.
That's not good enough.
That's a stackable offense.
The second I saw that it was clear they foot was miles back.
The rules need update to have to show the lines clearly in future plus appeals process by managers
That's a stackable offense.
The second I saw that it was clear they foot was miles back.
The rules need update to have to show the lines clearly in future plus appeals process by managers
Webb came back on the premise of fixing VAR. Well, it's ****ing fixed now. Why have they even brought back a man with his history of wrong/bent decisions? Who if getting the backhanders for this?
- May 22, 2011
- 73,755
- 25,682
- 113
The VAR decision to disallow Diaz’s goal wasn’t significant human error, it was blatant cheating. What’s made me more angry about it, if it can happen to one team, be it us, we can be pretty sure it will happen to others the officials have a dislike for.
You must log in or register to see images
Players of LFC should be allowed to post this picture tho… [HASHTAG]#LFC[/HASHTAG] #SpursVsReds [HASHTAG]#PremierLeague[/HASHTAG]
It’s okay as long as they apologise
No problem whatsoever
That’s now a tough game though because of the result today
They will have something to prove
Shame as today it was a cracking game till all the **** ups
Still Spurs fans will be happy
They need to show and record what the **** those dodgy bastards are doing g or the entire VAR concept is dead and buried.
said all along that VAR would be **** , is **** and will always be **** .If you must have something like it just have a quick look at normal TV to prevent huge offside errors* and blatant dives and thats it .
* Used to occasionally get them as players were so offside the lino didn't even notice them . Mind you these days by the time they recd the ball they would probably be considered onside anyway
* Used to occasionally get them as players were so offside the lino didn't even notice them . Mind you these days by the time they recd the ball they would probably be considered onside anyway
You must log in or register to see images
To be fair to Bein, I remember Bobby's 'armpit' goal against Villa a few seasons ago, and Andy Gray just wouldn't be fobbed off and forensically proved they'd changed the angles of the lines they'd drawn AND the fact they changed the frame from the one they originally put up that showed Bobby on by half a metre to a later frame when the ball had clearly left the foot about a second before.
- May 22, 2011
- 73,755
- 25,682
- 113
Wouldn’t believe a thing either of them two say to be honest. Prob too busy sexually harassing some woman in the background to know what’s happening.