1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Something we can all agree on....

Discussion in 'Queens Park Rangers' started by Peter Damage, Sep 18, 2014.

  1. Swords Hoopster.

    Swords Hoopster. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Messages:
    11,714
    Likes Received:
    1,113
    He's certainly not a bad Manager as is proven by the jobs he's done. Blackburn, Wales, City, Fulham, QPR and Stoke. He did well in four jobs, one's debatable and fu*ked up at one.

    He's just one of those Managers that can't handle transfer money. Of the six jobs listed above,the worst he did was at moneybags QPR and then he had a mixed time at City where he got decent results but squandered a lot of cash on a lot of dross. Managers like that are decent if they have a strong, preferably football-minded Chairman holding the reigns and keeping them on a tight leash. He did a great job at Stoke last year. Not only did he get them their highest ever finish but he transformed the way they played in the process. All in one season.

    What he did to us though can never be overstated. It was utterly disastrous.
     
    #21
  2. Kilburn

    Kilburn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    16,304
    Likes Received:
    9,952
    Good, balanced post Swords - he was like a kid in the candy store during the transfer market!
     
    #22
  3. Kampala Hoop

    Kampala Hoop Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2012
    Messages:
    357
    Likes Received:
    56
    I've got better memories of us under Hughes in the Premier League than Redknapp. Given a sensible chairman we might have consolidated under him as he has proven before. We need to cheer the team on tomorrow not waste our time giving the opposition manager stick
     
    #23
  4. Peter Damage

    Peter Damage Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    1,495
    Likes Received:
    312
    Typical comment for a high horse brigade member

    You starting up front? Me right wing? I'm better than SWP but still reckon we would be better off leaving it to the actual players to get the 3 points.


    Exactly what i mean. He didnt do it on purpose but thats irrelevant. He did do it!! and was paid £2 million+ for doing it then rather than resigning- he was dishonourable and stayed on and picked up an extra £4- 6 million pay off to add to our financial woes that he refused to take his share of responsibility for.

    If I was that bad at my job i wouldn't get an extra weeks wages. Let alone an extra 2 years wages.

    While the atmosphere at Sunderland and Hull was ... okay. It will be the fans who feel carry that displeasure at Hughes with them who will crank it up a notch. If thats 'macho football fan BS' then i'm fine with that. As i said not going to be booing him for 90 minutes. But if you approach games like this with an unaltered mentality to Sunderland and Hull then it would be like the Emirates or Carrow Road... Vanilla

    Understand though that every club has a section of the fan base that is vanilla- lets hope that is outweighed tomorrow
     
    #24
  5. Azmi

    Azmi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,232
    Likes Received:
    27
    #25
  6. QPR Oslo

    QPR Oslo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    21,686
    Likes Received:
    6,755
    Other aspect of this is as is coming through here. Hughes was bad for us but did well other places. Arry same same and not much different.
     
    #26

  7. Totallyqpr

    Totallyqpr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2012
    Messages:
    7,549
    Likes Received:
    3,991
    Harry's script writer is, like here, sometimes very, very good. As good as anything I've read from Austin (Jane, not Charlie).
    We (although I won't be at HQ) have got to get the balance right: Give him a lot of stick, give their players an uncomfortable lunch-time experience, but support the team when in possession.
     
    #27

Share This Page