Bit daft that a Hull fan would say that.
Didn't your top scorer only get 4?![]()
We addressed our striker issues in January. Luckily it wasn't too late.
Bit daft that a Hull fan would say that.
Didn't your top scorer only get 4?![]()
I'd argue that you paid so much on your wages because you went for players who already play in England.
You've had to give fat wedges to Huddlestone, Davies and Livermore because they were already on them at Spurs and Birmingham.
I trust Steve Walsh with our 30k wage budget. He's been nothing short of a miracle worker since he returned to the club.
Also, just because you had to sign loads to stay up doesn't mean everyone does.
We won the league with 102 points. You scraped second with 79. To compare us would be idiotic.
I think he's left footed.
Because our owner isn't a ****.
We walked the leaue.
We don't need vast improvements.
That's what's different.
Because our owner isn't a ****.
We walked the leaue.
We don't need vast improvements.
That's what's different.
How come our snodgrass thread has become a slanging match with a Leicester fan?
Because our owner isn't a ****.
We walked the leaue.
We don't need vast improvements.
That's what's different.
that's what Reading said when they p#ssed the championship a few years back with 106pts.look what happen there.
Yeah, they finished 8th.
hold my hand up to that, it was the season after they sunk without trace, stupid boySo I wasn't imagining it! Glad someone looked it up for me - I did a double-take earlier when I read Pudsey's post.
Naughty bear-tiger.

Sunderland 2004-2005 Championship winners 94 points
2005-2006 Relegated from Prem with 15 points rings a bell
Then what happened?
Oh yeah, they won the league again.
All that shows is that they were too good for the championship and not good enough for th prem, just like you will be if you don't sign a few top players.