In July 2006 the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee published a report on the management of risk. One of the subjects they looked at was passive smoking. The committee, whose members included former Chancellor Lord Lawson, concluded that, “Passive smoking is an example in which [government] policy demonstrates a disproportionate response to a relatively MINOR HEALTH PROBLEM, with INSUFFICIENT REGARD TO STATISTICAL EVIDENCE."
Back to beginngs, smoking in the stands, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,always was. get the crowds back, not interestd if you are a tree hugger , or a leaf hugger, bring on the real geezers.
Davros. if you buy it, light it, smoke it, breathe in the product,its dangerous if you just breathe in the product, its harmless that's what all your pontificating boils down to, and it is quite frankly, dumb. poison is poison is poison, yes the second hand is diluted somewhat but no-where near enough to render it insignificant
