Slutsky to undo one...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Slutsky was a clusterfuck. Adkins is getting there- there being preventing relegation. If he achieves that then we should be grateful, as it was a cast-iron certain under Slutsky.

Why is it thought it wasn't his decision on his coaching team?
 
Mr Bob said:
Slutskys full 20 game stats still outshine Adkins. I did it this way as last time someone complained it was unfair that Slutsky had twice the amount of games.
Click to expand...

slutsky p 20 w 4 d 7 L p f 35 a 37 pts 19
adkins p 16 w 4 d 5 L 7 f 16 a 19 pts 17

i can see how 19 points from 20 games massively outshines 17 points from 16 games.
 
x said:
slutsky p 20 w 4 d 7 L p f 35 a 37 pts 19
adkins p 16 w 4 d 5 L 7 f 16 a 19 pts 17

i can see how 19 points from 20 games massively outshines 17 points from 16 games.
Click to expand...

It wasn't 17 from 16 was it, and I never said massively outshines.

I really have no idea what point you're trying to make here.
 
Mr Bob said:
It wasn't 17 from 16 was it, and I never said massively outshines.

I really have no idea what point you're trying to make here.
Click to expand...

no, i added "massively". you're cherry picking, that's all. one single result put adkins points per game average above slutsky's and you said "slutskys full 20 game stats still outshine adkins." and you did say it after it became 17 from 16. if adkins gets three points in the next four games, he'll have picked up more from 20 games than slutsky. granted it might well be less fun without all the goals.

perhaps you could let us know what point you're trying to make, because it doesn't appear to hold water.
 
x said:
no, i added "massively". you're cherry picking, that's all. one single result put adkins points per game average above slutsky's and you said "slutskys full 20 game stats still outshine adkins." and you did say it after it became 17 from 16. if adkins gets three points in the next four games, he'll have picked up more from 20 games than slutsky. granted it might well be less fun without all the goals.

perhaps you could let us know what point you're trying to make, because it doesn't appear to hold water.
Click to expand...

Maybe I should have said outshone, if it would appease your pedantry I could edit the post for you? It was abundantly clear what I meant considering I was explaining why I used equal games played. Besides, equal games served better to answer the question that was asked anyway, and if I'd done 20 vs 15 you'd just have piped up that it wasn't a fair comparison, as happened last time.

If you have anything else to add that isn't more nit picking waffle then feel free.
 
Mr Bob said:
Maybe I should have said outshone, if it would appease your pedantry I could edit the post for you? It was abundantly clear what I meant considering I was explaining why I used equal games played. Besides, equal games served better to answer the question that was asked anyway, and if I'd done 20 vs 15 you'd just have piped up that it wasn't a fair comparison, as happened last time.

If you have anything else to add that isn't more nit picking waffle then feel free.
Click to expand...

i assumed you were trying to use figures to make a point.
 
it's nice to read different opinions about Leo's time at Hull City and his legacy.
It does exist or doesn't exist?
Who knows the truth.
I remember a lot of unlucky late minutes (after 86 or so) under Leo, but i don't remember unlucky minutes under Adkins at all. It was straight failure mostly if it was. That's biggest difference in games under different coaches for me, but overall their both results are bad and very close to each other (let's be honest). Cheers!
 
City Man said:
Both are probably decent managers.

Not sure why people focus their scrutiny on their shortcomings when the reasons for our decline are 100% down to the bungling mismanagement of our squad and football management staff by the usual suspect.

5th manager in 18 months or so.

Do the math.
Click to expand...
Therein lies the tale.
Ehab's looking for immortality via The Guinness Book of World Records as his old man didn't make HRH's Honours List.
He's a big fan of Cellino, but wants to better his record of having 45 managers in 26 years of owning football clubs.
Heaven help us.
 
Leo's soporific quotient was far lower than Nigel's.
Both struggled with the use/abuse of the English language, Nigel had an unfair advantage. Leo admitted his limitations. Nigel spends an eternity explaining nothing worth hearing.
 
Rock'n'Roll said:
it's nice to read different opinions about Leo's time at Hull City and his legacy.
It does exist or doesn't exist?
Who knows the truth.
I remember a lot of unlucky late minutes (after 86 or so) under Leo, but i don't remember unlucky minutes under Adkins at all. It was straight failure mostly if it was. That's biggest difference in games under different coaches for me, but overall their both results are bad and very close to each other (let's be honest). Cheers!
Click to expand...

Some claimed the fitness was lacking under Slutsky and that's why we folded at the end of games.
 
armchairfan said:
Some claimed the fitness was lacking under Slutsky and that's why we folded at the end of games.
Click to expand...

that's one kind of guessing about fitness (as about low morale, low quality of subs, small team and so on and so on)...i've really seen bad moon rising at last minutes of some games! 10 points are lost (at least). Some examples maybe incorrect, we know about different circumstances and so on, but generally it's right and mystical horror stat it is.

August 15. Wolverhampton. Time to concede (TTC) - 90 min. The final result is 2-3. -1 point.
August 19. QPR. TTC - 90 min. 1-2. -1 point.
September 23rd. Reading. TTC - 87 min. 1-1. -2 points.
September 26. Preston. TTC - 88 min. 1-2. -1 point.
October 14. Norwich. TTC - 90 min. 1-1. -2 points.
October 28. Nottingham Forest. TTC - 83 min. 2-3. -1 point.
November 18. Ipswich. TTC - 88 minutes. 2-2. -2 points.
 
Rock'n'Roll said:
that's one kind of guessing about fitness (as about low morale, low quality of subs, small team and so on and so on)...i've really seen bad moon rising at last minutes of some games! 10 points are lost (at least). Some examples maybe incorrect, we know about different circumstances and so on, but generally it's right and mystical horror stat it is.

August 15. Wolverhampton. Time to concede (TTC) - 90 min. The final result is 2-3. -1 point.
August 19. QPR. TTC - 90 min. 1-2. -1 point.
September 23rd. Reading. TTC - 87 min. 1-1. -2 points.
September 26. Preston. TTC - 88 min. 1-2. -1 point.
October 14. Norwich. TTC - 90 min. 1-1. -2 points.
October 28. Nottingham Forest. TTC - 83 min. 2-3. -1 point.
November 18. Ipswich. TTC - 88 minutes. 2-2. -2 points.
Click to expand...

i think the wolves one is wrong
they made it 3-1 in the 90th min and then we got a penalty with the massive stoppage time
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back