This is not a simple subject to find the answer for, otherwise we'd already have the solution and have acted on it.
I listened to the first video from this guy, but won't put myself though the second. Enough is enough. There are so many things wrong with what he says, especially his pathetic attempts at root cause analysis.
It is widely known by all who wish to understand it, that the root cause to this extremism is largely down to state-sponsored funding, ideology and training by Iran & Saudi Arabia. Until this is properly tackled, we will continue to have problems worldwide. But you know nothing's going to happen on that front when Trump has just bragged about his deal to sell the Saudis $110bn of arms. Where do you think the arms will end up? You can burn down as many mosques as you like, but you won't remove the problem - indeed, you'll probably exacerbate it. They'll just move elsewhere. In fact, they probably just use the mosque to mask the covert structure they operate under.
Finally, has anyone got any idea who these extremists actually kill. White people? Christians? That's what loonies like Robinson would have you believe. Note that he never provides any sources - just pure rhetoric, racism & shouting, and like all the most influential activists, a small sprinkling of truth. A small sprinkling. The quote I'm about to paste in is an extract from an article I stumbled on fairly randomly. By all means follow the link after it & read the whole article if you want a clearer insight to the truth. Or do a little personal research. Whatever you do, don't form your opinions based on this guy's spoutings.
"In cases where the religious affiliation of terrorism casualties could be determined, Muslims suffered between 82 and 97% of terrorism-related fatalities over the past five years".
http://www.globalresearch.ca/muslim...rism-related-fatalities-us-government/5516565
I'm not for a moment suggesting I've got all the answers. I haven't. What I am suggesting is that this guy not only doesn't know the answers - he clearly doesn't know what the problem is!
I'll reply to this post, but not your others.
Maybe you could take the article to the families of all those that died at Manchester, or the family of the Soldier who got chopped up, and all the other families around the world who have lost someone to Muslim related bombings, fighting and Terrorism.
The Muslims have been fighting Christians, Jews and others as far back as the 1100's, and beyond, especially for the town of Jerusalem back in the days of the Holy Land and the crusades.
Saladin was the muslim leader who led his armies against the Crusades and Knights Templar, as well as winning and eventually losing Jerusalem to King Richard the Lionheart, however, after seeking a truce with King Richard, Saladin went on the rampage going into other Muslim countries and defeating them, includes Egypt, Syria and the then Northern Mesopotamia.
Muslims have been killing Muslims for centuries, even Saddam Hussein was killing Muslims. Muslims have been trying to overpower each other since Saladin after the Crusades.
The Muslim extremists of this era actually are killing white people, Christians and any other non believers and those that don't conform to their way and beliefs, it's on the telly and news on a regular basis, might not be the main Isis force, but there are plenty of sleeper Isis extremists around the world. The reason you only hear of Isis killing other Muslims is for territory, but mainly cos the main Isis force are based somewhere in the Arab Countries, so it stands to reason the only people they can fight are other Arabs and Muslims.
The fight against Muslims is not just about Isis, it's also about Muslims taking over the world.
Ever stop to think why Muslims crossed all borders into Western Countries, Europe, Asian Countries, America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and other Countries including Russia.
Was it because they wanted a better life, were they actually fleeing from persecution, and why predominantly Christian Countries and not other Muslim Countries; most seem to hate democracy, but exploit it's freedoms, but still call for Muslim states under Sharia law in all Countries......doesn't make sense, does it, can only be one logical reason, they want to take over the world, kill all who are not Muslim and have a Muslim world free of Christians, Jews and other religions and beliefs.
During and after the Afghan war, Mosques started cropping up all over the World, it was said back then, and reported that the Bin Ladens, who were apparently billionaires were funding the building of most if not all Mosques around the World, WHY!....Mosques bring and attract Muslims. It's also been said, and reported that Muslims wanted to buy farms and ranches to build Mosques on, they were also campaigning to councils etc to have Mosques built in remote towns and villages, WHY! so they could bring more Muslims to the areas.
I could go on and on, but everything seems to point to, and strongly suggest the Muslims want to take over the World.....will never happen; Romans tried it, Napoleon did too, Hitler had a crack, and all failed. Genghis Khan just wanted to unite the whole of Asia as one Country / Continent.
Incidentally, the Muslim faith is not a religion but an ideology created by a human being called Mohammed.
As the story goes, and some, if not all Muslims will disagree, Mohammed was kicked out of a religious group, so he decided to make his own faith / ideology approximately 600 years after Christ was born. It is said he took a little bit from the Christian, Jew and Buddhist faiths etc to form his own faith, then he added his own as he went along.
One of those rights for all Muslim males was the right to marry a 9 year old girl and have sex with her, this apparently came about cos Mohammed himself took a 9 yr old girl as his wife and had continual sex with her, they could actually marry a 1 year old girl, but could not have sex with her till she was 9 years old, he also gave them the right to have one or more wives which they have a right to beat if they wanted too. Along the way some Muslims thought they had the right to rape any women they pleased, but the women would be blamed, and punished for being raped, sometimes stoned, sometimes executed. Very sick, very very sick, but that's part of Sharia law..........I wonder how those many many rape victims would react to your article.
I don't think any decent human being would want one of those types living next door, or many living in the next shire.
No Jock, it's not just about Isis and terrorism, it's about all the problems every Country in the world are having with Muslims.
At least Mr Robinson is standing up and trying to do something.