Should Sock Accounts be Allowed?

[FosseFilberto]

Ok, so @brb created an account called The Village Bike it was a multi account so himself @Hoddle Is A God and @DMD decided to post pictures of the lead singer of The Grateful Dead and pretend it is HAIG so that @Skylarker and @The Liebherr Legacy get blamed and have to post on the Sunderland board only. It all went wrong and Sky's sock account @DUNCAN DONUTS ended up admitting that he was Sky and brb banned him so @Stan left in protest and created lots of socks.

That's pretty much how it all went down.

..... you left out the biscuits ffs!

 

[luvgonzo]

This Village Bike. Would she make for a beautiful wife?

Well it is for riding so maybe.

 

[ValleyGraduate12]

I told you ages ago to start posting here. Welcome to the nut house.

I haven't been on much lately because I've been busy with work so I've always popped up when chaos reigns but missed out on what started it

 

[luvgonzo]

..... you left out the biscuits ffs!

It was a while ago now I can remember everything but my post was the jist of it.

 

[brb]

Maybe not, mate.

I’ll take your word for it..

If a sock gets spammed out the site, it takes everything with it

Quotes may remain, so DMD will blitz them, with my ok. The object of that is so that anything relating to the sock is destroyed.

I think the only thing that remains might be 'likes.'

 

[Tiddler]

This Village Bike. Would she make for a beautiful wife?

Spits less than a camel does.

 

[NSIS]

If a sock gets spammed out the site, it takes everything with it

Quotes may remain, so DMD will blitz them, with my ok. The object of that is so that anything relating to the sock is destroyed.

I think the only thing that remains might be 'likes.'

Ok, I understand.

All I remember is luv and one other poster complain that their posts had been altered.

I’ve been kind of busy the last few days and just pop in on my phone when I get a minute. So I haven’t followed the whole narrative.

If it’s all been sorted now, fair enough.

 

[brb]

So far this morning i've removed 9 spambots and 1 sock from the system. The Spambots actually nearly wiped out a board today....so having to deal with socks is an added inconvenience that affects everyone.

Spambots are my priority they are the ones that can affect users and the site the most. DMD technically would have trouble controlling Spambots due to their nature of aggressiveness.

My view is we don't have time to fook about, just blitz everything, problem that then creates innocent parties risk getting shot in the crossfire.

 

[Hoddle is a god]

Totally true.

Old tubby saxton has had his life exposed here and that is his own fault. Likewise HIAG has been doxxed but the info that doxxed him was given freely by him.

Now obviously it's not nice to be doxxed but if you're that unpleasant (saxton) or you've been goading people to find out about you (HIAG) then it's not at all surprising.

However, reality are both are ban-able offences.

Lastly, is there actually any evidence that the people who HIAG wants banned actually did the crime because as far as i can see, it's just HIAG pointing fingers at his arch nemeses.

Sorry, but this is utter bollocks.

I didn’t give any of my personal information out. Skiddy boasted about finding it, and he and Pixie proceeded to release details. It was a cyber attack pure and simple.

If someone finds out who I am, they have absolutely no right to make that information freely available. Only I have that right.

How about I obtain your personal information and make it freely available?

 

[FosseFilberto]

Sorry, but this is utter bollocks.

I didn’t give any of my personal information out. Skiddy boasted about finding it, and he and Pixie proceeded to release details. It was a cyber attack pure and simple.

If someone finds out who I am, they have absolutely no right to make that information freely available. Only I have that right.

How about I obtain your personal information and make it freely available?

Your personal information was in the public domain Quentin .... unless you have copyrighted the images you have no legal redress as far as I can see...

Morally you might have a point... but football forums and morality have something of a tenuous relationship... as several of your posts have amply demonstrated over the years

 

[SpursDisciple]

to be honest i'm a lone ranger mate. Even to this moment now i've never had a PM or seen those pics that everyones seen .

You ****ers all of you including you haven't shared a shred of information with me

Or me and I prefer it that way

 

[Hoddle is a god]

If it wasn't HIAG, you wouldn't be taking the stance you are now taking ... he's the Spurs special needs case

I doubt it would have happened to you ... and that's the real point here ... as the late lamented, but possibly not banned Stan commented, HIAG's existence on here has been a catalogue of mocking, demeaning and belittling the comments, achievements and lifestyles of those that he has had issues with ... and has led to him getting banned from several club boards ... feelings towards him have been further exacerbated by his claims of superiority and preeminence ... which we now know have been hugely inflated ... because some people got fed up of his boasting and general attitude and decided to bring him down a peg or two ... posting his personal details was wrong ... but why did it happen to HIAG and not to someone else?

His big problem now is ego ... he is positively fuming that his self promoted myth of being some sort of cross between Jon Bon Jovi and a character from L.A. Law has been exposed as closer to Yvonne Ton Bovine and a jobbing conveyancer with Turnip & Co ... that has him rattled to **** and he is finding it hard to deal with ...

... but if the "New HIAG was genuinely interested in Board harmony, he'd just move on and let it go ... but he won't ... his ego won't allow it ... he was out manoeuvred by some of his prime adversaries ... and it galls him ...

... he needs to just accept that ... it's like footie ... we can't all be winners ... be the bigger man and move on

If anything, uncovering who I am has only enhanced my reputation on this site. I am not a jobbing conveyancer, and the very fact that you feel the need to make that insult demonstrates the extent to which you feel threatened by me. It isn’t my ego that has been damaged, but your own.

That isn’t the point.

No one has the right to post my personal information, whether as an act of revenge for some ill conceived wrong that I did them or not.

 

[Hoddle is a god]

Your personal information was in the public domain Quentin .... unless you have copyrighted the images you have no legal redress as far as I can see...

Morally you might have a point... but football forums and morality have something of a tenuous relationship... as several of your posts have amply demonstrated over the years

No, it wasn’t, you half wit.

 

[Big Ern]

If anything, uncovering who I am has only enhanced my reputation in this site.

hmmmm, your fraudulent brags were exposed and you flounced off iirc, hardly reputation enhancing acts.

 

[Spurlock]

I find it baffling when Laws of the land dictate people's own moral compass all of the time...especially when they themselves could be exposed in the same way.

 

[BobbyD]

Sorry, but this is utter bollocks.

I didn’t give any of my personal information out. Skiddy boasted about finding it, and he and Pixie proceeded to release details. It was a cyber attack pure and simple.

If someone finds out who I am, they have absolutely no right to make that information freely available. Only I have that right.

How about I obtain your personal information and make it freely available?

i would find that very sad.... but if i've given the info freely then i guess it's my fault. I would hope that i hadn't antagonised you in a way that you would want to do that to me.

They shouldn't have posted it but i understand why it has been done.

edit: apparantly people googled lawyer dorset rock god. That's all the evidence i have to go by so unless you think they got your personal info by other means, you have shared that info out before (tbh i'm wary of that as you wrote so much about yourself i didnt know what was true or false)

 

[Libby]

.

 

[FosseFilberto]

No, it wasn’t, you half wit.

So your information wasn't accessible to anyone on Facebook? ... ya Fookin quarter wit, Quents

 

[FosseFilberto]

If anything, uncovering who I am has only enhanced my reputation in this site. I am not a jobbing conveyancer, and tfe very fact that you feel the need to make that insult demonstrates the extent to which you feel threatened by me. It isn’t my ego that has been damaged, but your own.

That isn’t the point.

No one has the right to post my personal information, whether as an act of revenge for some ill conceived wrong that I did them or not.

Unfortunately Quents ...as I said before ... you might have had your rights infringed morally ... but certainly not legally ... come on mate ... you are more than a jobbing conveyancer... you should know this stuff

 

[Spurlock]

So people wouldn't like it done to themselves but understand why it was done to Hiag...because he made stories up that were obviously fake but still got under people's skin....San Fran Marathon in Honolulu....that's the bit I fell for

You must log in or register to see images