Should Sock Accounts be Allowed?

[Commachio]

If it wasn't HIAG, you wouldn't be taking the stance you are now taking ... he's the Spurs special needs case

I doubt it would have happened to you ... and that's the real point here ... as the late lamented, but possibly not banned Stan commented, HIAG's existence on here has been a catalogue of mocking, demeaning and belittling the comments, achievements and lifestyles of those that he has had issues with ... and has led to him getting banned from several club boards ... feelings towards him have been further exacerbated by his claims of superiority and preeminence ... which we now know have been hugely inflated ... because some people got fed up of his boasting and general attitude and decided to bring him down a peg or two ... posting his personal details was wrong ... but why did it happen to HIAG and not to someone else?

His big problem now is ego ... he is positively fuming that his self promoted myth of being some sort of cross between Jon Bon Jovi and a character from L.A. Law has been exposed as closer to Yvonne Ton Bovine and a jobbing conveyancer with Turnip & Co ... that has him rattled to **** and he is finding it hard to deal with ...

... but if the "New HIAG was genuinely interested in Board harmony, he'd just move on and let it go ... but he won't ... his ego won't allow it ... he was out manoeuvred by some of his prime adversaries ... and it galls him ...

... he needs to just accept that ... it's like footie ... we can't all be winners ... be the bigger man and move on

Sometimes less is more mate.

 

[BobbyD]

If somebody put pictures of my family up on here, I would be demanding that posters IP address was banned forever.

what if i called you a **** and said your daughter is utter filth compared to my little princess (i don't have one) and said you're worthless saxon-esque life is nothing compared to my millionaire playboy style? I couldn't be banned but if i had also said i was the only chinese doctor in wales and you could find me.....

 

[Spurlock]

If it wasn't HIAG, you wouldn't be taking the stance you are now taking

Not true

 

[FosseFilberto]

I don't blame Bambi for his fear.

He needs to belong. I understand that.

Unlike you Quents ... it's not all about me ... time for you to accept that you were outmanoevred by some of those that have rattled you most ... and just move on from it ... be the bigger man in spirit Quents ... not just waist measurement

 

[thefanwithnoname]

Totally true.

Old tubby saxton has had his life exposed here and that is his own fault. Likewise HIAG has been doxxed but the info that doxxed him was given freely by him.

Now obviously it's not nice to be doxxed but if you're that unpleasant (saxton) or you've been goading people to find out about you (HIAG) then it's not at all surprising.

However, reality are both are ban-able offences.

Lastly, is there actually any evidence that the people who HIAG wants banned actually did the crime because as far as i can see, it's just HIAG pointing fingers at his arch nemeses.

Dont know I didn't get involved.

I wasnt suprised where it went though. As i said imo both parties played a role

I know I've given details to some "friends" on here, some voluntarily and some when asked. No one will know if its true or false but I dont give it large IMO, odd wum with some posters accepted. But Pete's meltdown about my education with others constantly fuming about my house, work etc is worse IMO than if I posted pics or used my real name etc

 

[SpursDisciple]

Sometimes less is more mate.

Can someone put that under Fosse's username. Please.

 

[Spurlock]

It's bullshit to suggest people shouldn't talk about their daily lives on here in fear of getting doxxed, in order to somehow relieve yourself of blame and justify your own ****ty efforts.

After the politics thread the most popular thread on here is 'What are you doing', people talk about themselves on here everyday...it's bullshit to suggest that that gives some one the right to plaster that persons personal info allover here. Someone must be rattled to kingdom **** by that individual to go into the effort of exposing him. I have my **** with Skiddy on a daily basis here but I'll be ****ed if I care enough to want to prove him wrong with hard evidence to shut him up or to just try to embarrass him.

 

[BobbyD]

If it wasn't HIAG, you wouldn't be taking the stance you are now taking ... he's the Spurs special needs case

I doubt it would have happened to you ... and that's the real point here ... as the late lamented, but possibly not banned Stan commented, HIAG's existence on here has been a catalogue of mocking, demeaning and belittling the comments, achievements and lifestyles of those that he has had issues with ... and has led to him getting banned from several club boards ... feelings towards him have been further exacerbated by his claims of superiority and preeminence ... which we now know have been hugely inflated ... because some people got fed up of his boasting and general attitude and decided to bring him down a peg or two ... posting his personal details was wrong ... but why did it happen to HIAG and not to someone else?

His big problem now is ego ... he is positively fuming that his self promoted myth of being some sort of cross between Jon Bon Jovi and a character from L.A. Law has been exposed as closer to Yvonne Ton Bovine and a jobbing conveyancer with Turnip & Co ... that has him rattled to **** and he is finding it hard to deal with ...

... but if the "New HIAG was genuinely interested in Board harmony, he'd just move on and let it go ... but he won't ... his ego won't allow it ... he was out manoeuvred by some of his prime adversaries ... and it galls him ...

... he needs to just accept that ... it's like footie ... we can't all be winners ... be the bigger man and move on

you know what, i think HIAG plays a part in it for spurlock but i do think he's probably more like libs and sky and would probably take a stand on anyone being doxxed even if you dont think so.

Libby in particular wasn't enamoured by HIAG but was against it too and i'm sure spur is of the same ilk.

However i'm pretty certain if it was Ginge i don't think Spurlock would have kicked up much of a fuss, just as no one gives a **** about fatty pete getting doxxed

editted as i said libby was enamoured, he's not

 

[FosseFilberto]

If somebody put pictures of my family up on here, I would be demanding that posters IP address was banned forever.

The only picture that could be recognised was of Les himself ... whilst I have condemned the sharing of even that ... it's time for a bit of perspective ... it's all about ego now.

 

[BobbyD]

It's bullshit to suggest people shouldn't talk about their daily lives on here in fear of getting doxxed, in order to somehow attach blame and justify your own feelings of that poster.

After the politics thread the most popular thread on here is 'What are you doing', people talk about themselves on here everyday...it's bullshit to suggest that gives some one the right to plaster that persons personal info allover here. Someone must be rattled to kingdom **** by that individual to go into the effort of exposing him. I have my **** with Skiddy on a daily basis here but I'll be ****ed if I care enough to want to prove him wrong with hard evidence to shut him up or to just try to embarrass him.

i have nothing against HIAG, i think i actually get on alright with him but you know me, if i don't like it (except fat pete) then i normally just ignore someone.

HIAG being doxxed isn't right but you can't say you aren't surprised especially with some of the personal stuff going on.

HIAG used to stick to footie but before the doxxing both sides were getting all personal.

 

[FosseFilberto]

you know what, i think HIAG plays a part in it for spurlock but i do think he's probably more like libs and sky and would probably take a stand on anyone being doxxed even if you dont think so.

Libby in particular was enamoured by HIAG.

However i'm pretty certain if it was Ginge i don't think Spurlock would have kicked up much of a fuss, just as no one gives a **** about fatty pete getting doxxed

I agree ... but not to the same extent ... perhaps that's natural ... but the Spurs loyalty certainly exists... the mutual backslapping and excuses for HIAG's antics are self evident ...

 

[Commachio]

It's bullshit to suggest people shouldn't talk about their daily lives on here in fear of getting doxxed, in order to somehow relieve yourself of blame and justify your own ****ty efforts.

After the politics thread the most popular thread on here is 'What are you doing', people talk about themselves on here everyday...it's bullshit to suggest that that gives some one the right to plaster that persons personal info allover here. Someone must be rattled to kingdom **** by that individual to go into the effort of exposing him. I have my **** with Skiddy on a daily basis here but I'll be ****ed if I care enough to want to prove him wrong with hard evidence to shut him up or to just try to embarrass him.

I agree with this to some extent. Everyone has seen me several times. That is my choosing. Same as several others on here have openly and freely posted themselves.

 

[FosseFilberto]

you know what, i think HIAG plays a part in it for spurlock but i do think he's probably more like libs and sky and would probably take a stand on anyone being doxxed even if you dont think so.

Libby in particular was enamoured by HIAG.

However i'm pretty certain if it was Ginge i don't think Spurlock would have kicked up much of a fuss, just as no one gives a **** about fatty pete getting doxxed

Last para on the money ...

 

[Spurlock]

I agree with this to some extent. Everyone has seen me several times. That is my choosing. Same as several others on here have openly and freely posted themselves.

I've put a pic up too...if someone has got it locked and hidden in a file on their laptop then as weird as that is, I can kind of say...I shouldn't have put it up.

If people have just pieced bits of my life together from what I discuss on here on a daily basis like we all do and then gone and found that person...then that's making a big statement about how that person feels about someone on here.

 

[Spurlock]

you know what, i think HIAG plays a part in it for spurlock but i do think he's probably more like libs and sky and would probably take a stand on anyone being doxxed even if you dont think so.

Libby in particular was enamoured by HIAG.

However i'm pretty certain if it was Ginge i don't think Spurlock would have kicked up much of a fuss, just as no one gives a **** about fatty pete getting doxxed

I'm not kicking up a fuss..I joined in a discussion where Fosse felt it necessery to highlight that Hiag is requesting a ban...considering why Hiag is requesting a ban...I made the point that Fosse can't suggest how offended Hiag should be over the matter.

You can't extrapolate how I would behave if that was Skiddy because it's a whole new ball game to the daily shenanigans on here.

Maybe you can create a sock account and plaster Skiddy's life on here and then see how I react? Until then you can't judge my non existing non reaction to Skiddy just because you want to dilute the effectiveness of my point regarding this matter.

 

[Spurlock]

Last para on the money ...

You can't prove that though can you? Yet you are convinced.

Yet you want hard evidence about wether Hiag is correct in blaming who he blames...even though your gut instincts would probably guide you to a handful of people.

You're not kidding me Fosse, only yourself.

 

[Spurlock]

Anyway....time for a Spliff..I think I have created plenty debate for tomorrow

The Gods will be pleased.

 

[Commachio]

I've put a pic up too...if someone has got it locked and hidden in a file on their laptop then as weird as that is, I can kind of say...I shouldn't have put it up.

If people have just pieced bits of my life together from what I discuss on here on a daily basis like we all do then that's making a big statement about how that person feels about someone on here.

This is the thing mate. I'm overtly open, so when people see me, i expect some kind off backlash and abuse.

It;s those who brag and leave themselves exposed, that do not deserve any protection imo.

 

[FosseFilberto]

You can't prove that though can you? Yet you are convinced.

Yet you want hard evidence about wether Hiag is correct in blaming who he blames...even though your gut instincts would probably guide you to a handful of people.

You're not kidding me Fosse, only yourself.

I'm kidding nobody ... just keeping it real ... HIAG's taunting and mockery of his main adversaries came back to haunt him ... he's cried for bans before and he's doing it again ... as Bobby said, if it was Ginger it is incredibly unlikely that you would be reacting the same and far more likely that you would think that he had mostly brought it on himself ... that is exactly the same for HIAG in many people's eyes ... the truth did indeed crush someone ... or rather it battered one person's pompously inflated and considerably exaggerated reality

It's time to move on.

 

[FosseFilberto]

This is the thing mate. I'm overtly open, so when people see me, i expect some kind off backlash and abuse.

It;s those who brag and leave themselves exposed, that do not deserve any protection imo.

Amen ... HIAG's arrogance came back to bite him ... that is wholly down to him.

I doubt anyone else would have engendered the will for the expose that took place, irrespective of the often intense rivalries that have existed on here.